OUR VIEWS/EDITORIALS

COLUMNS

LONG READS

World Views

The Most/Recent Articles

Monaem Sarker: The bright face of a leading reclusive politician in Bangladesh

He played a vital role during Bangladesh’s Liberation War of 1971.

by Anwar A. Khan

As an active worker in the progressive political movement of Bangladesh, the contribution of this humble man was undaunted. His diverse experiences, fighting skills, honesty and determination are the only support for his progressive thinking and has dedicated to the welfare of the common people still has an undying love for Bangabandhu, the architect of Bangladesh, the father of the nation, his adage is the last path of life and his firm belief that he will continue to work till the last day of his life to fulfill Bangabandhu’s dream.

Monaem Sarker with his spouse [File Photo]

A giant star cloistered politician, a bang-up researcher, a fecund writer, and a fine-grained gentleman with a pleasing in appearance as he has been, Monaem Sarker is a Cumilla native aged now 79 plus, was born on March 30, 1945. His political life history spans for about 6 decennaries.

With an M.Sc. degree in Applied Physics with credit from Dhaka University in 1967, Monaem Sarker best-loved the life of a whole-souled political worker being pulled in by the left-winger politics. He manifested notable role in the politics of the-then East Pakistan students’ Union, Communist Party, NAP and afterwards Bangladesh Awami League.

He played a vital role during Bangladesh’s Liberation War of 1971. After the brutal assassination of Bangabandhu on 15 August 1975, he worked very hard to form vox populi pointed to rebuilding the values and ideals of independence as pursued by Bangabandhu.

Readers may find a patriotic Monaem Sarker about whom Bangladesh’s famed novelist and short story writer Shawkat Osman wrote on January 17, 1979, “The search for life mingled so homogeneously with patriotism that Monaem Sarker could not stay no more in his own country after the death of Bangabandhu. Here (Kolkata), he as if became the guardian of all political refugees. He kept himself engaged in ways knew no bounds for collecting funds and to keep the political activities remain free flowing. During his life in exile in India, he developed a deep personal relationship with political stalwarts there and different secret leaflets, booklets were published at his initiative to bring back Awami League to power.

He also had a special role in bringing out various weeklies, biweeklies and monthlies. At those times, the Brajrakantho from Kolkata, Banglar Dak, Sonar Bangla, Sun Rise, et al, from London were brought out to establish public opinion at abroad in favour of pro-Bangladesh and pro-liberation forces.

Getting back in the country in 1979, he played a unique role in forming the Bangabandhu Parishad. He joined Bangladesh Awami League in the same year at the inspiration of the political orientation of Bangabandhu. He pioneered in the formation of 10-Party and 15-Party alliances against autocratic military governments of Zia and Ershad in preparing agenda and conducting movements.

In establishing common platform of the three alliances for preparing roadmap of movement, he consecrated himself very profoundly. Keeping himself in solitude, Monaem Sarker has been working as a pivotal power of all democratic and progressive movements of the country. His activities in the fields of economics, social and cultural movements are also long-familiar and popular characteristic characterized by or advocating or based upon the principles of democracy or social equality.

Besides Bangladesh Awami League politics, he also took intensive part in the fields of cultural and literary firmament, being one of the founders of the Udichi. He is a popular columnist and writer. He edited Bangabandhu Biography in two volumes published by Bangla Academy.

He authored 116 books mainly on political and social affairs and got numerous awards from different organizations of which Bangla academy “Honorary fellowship 2013” is remarkable. He is now the Chairman of The Bangladesh Foundation for Development Research (BFDR), a stellar research organization which was established in 1996 to carry out research on Bangla Language, Liberation War, Culture, Formation of the Bangalee nation, state, et al. Under his leadership BFDR produced 10 DVDs and VCDs which are available in the BFDR website.

Monaem Sarker remains an iconic figure of Southeast Asian politics and an historical advocate for the development and sovereignty of the Global Southeast Asia. He is a shining example of what it means to be a versatile talent. Dispersion of talent in debates, recitals, art, other cultural activities and has remained for decennaries one of the most definitive observers on Bengalis, Bangladesh, Bangabandhu and the Bangladesh political world – as well as a historian of the tumultuous events of 1952, 1962, 1969, 1970 and 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War in which he mightily participated.

Calling him a political icon, we must say he has massively participated in enriching intellectual life with his books, articles, political and historical studies. Monaem Sarker has always described himself as a politician, first and foremost. But his unique role as a participant in, and a chronicler of, Bangladesh’s history drew politicians of all stripes — liberals, nationalists, et al.

He has remained the intellectual godfather of a set of ideas and a period in history that many perceive him to be one of progressives, dignified and national prestige figures. Career as an author spanning for more than half a century and his access to regional and international audiences has been greatly enhanced by his regular appearances on the seminars, symposiums, et al.

A well-connected politician, commentator, and master propagandist, Sarker has crafted the message of Bangabandhu and has been defending his legacy long after his death. His books are consistent best read in the Bengali world, and his political analysis is accorded respect. His opinion is being sought in hour-long indoor interviews and behind closed door meetings in the corridors of power. His influence has endured the epochs of long-reigning by PM Sheikh Hasina, her political struggles, and political dead cert.

A giant politician who became a confidant of Sheikh Hasina. He has remained relevant long after Bangabandhu died, respected for his wide network of international contacts and extraordinary analytical skills. He can be described as “the nation’s authentic memory.”

Established a distinctive political school that combined political analysis with a magnificent writing style. He is widely regarded as the books of record in the Bangladesh world. His voice is full of patriotism, his mind like a razor, that of a veteran fighter, writer, sage, perhaps the most important living witness and historian of modern Bangladesh.

He is a man of such eloquence, such energy, with such a vast memory, that men and women who are younger – a quality he much admires, and which he has won because of his humane attributes.

This veteran Bangladesh’s politician is best privately known as Sheikh Hasina’s taciturnly mouthpiece. He grew up as a talented young person liked and admired by all around him. Monaem Sarker, the legendary Bangladesh’s politician, embarked on his political journey since his school days with a unique blend of academic pursuit and passion for social relations.

He carries the image of being a doer, has won praise from both within his party and outside. He continues to be a significant power centre within the ruling establishment who has spearheaded the government’s foreign policy agenda, which has increasingly been getting endorsement by the concerned quarters.

A quintessential backroom player, he will continue to work to ke­e­p the administrative machinery of the government humming. He could take a long-term view of the developmental initiatives that could help Bangladesh in decades ahead, not necessarily thinking in terms of the next election only. In his long political life, it would be impossible to find someone who did not like him as a person, ideological orientations being another matter.

Despite no official position, Sarker is a keen follower of Bangabandhu’s people’s welfare-oriented politics. In person, Sarker comes across as an effective administrator, a proud Bengali nationalist, and a committed Bangladesh. He also is a policy maven—introverted, precise, and even passionate about the most technical of subjects. On almost all of these issues, his Bangladesh is pushing and following, Bangladesh.

As a stripling, he was comprehending the national developments to realise how tough a task it is for the nation to re-establish itself on the global stage, and simultaneously give its people what they needed to lead a dignified life. He understood the pulse of the people and has been blessed with the gift of a flawless research-based oratory that touched the hearts of the listener, through his speeches. He endeared himself to the people, stuck dexterously to his ideological moorings in thick and thin.

No one has ever seen any sense of arrogance in the Monaem Sarker, such friendly and hospitable people are rare in our society. Our society needs many more virtuous and unselfish people like Monaem Sarker, only then Bangladesh will move forward faster.

He cherishes the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons of all religions live together in harmony with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which he hopes to live for, and to see realised. It is an ideal for which he is prepared to die.

Monaem Sarker continues to be held in high regard by all who know him and he will be remembered for his grace, leadership, kindness, contributions towards Bangladesh’s betterment.

He has the gift of tenderness of heart, and this was his art of winning the hearts of people. He is affectionate and empathetic. Adversities could never demoralise him, rather these occasions gave him greater determination to succeed. He accepted challenges. For, party management is an art and not a craft as practised by the new generation of most politicians. His research-oriented books indicate his concern for the nation and the people. Most of his time is spent thinking over politics, but I never found him desolate, or withdrawn.

His strength and beauty, the grace and dignity of his bearing, the dark light of his eyes, his imposing appearance, and from the moment he began to speak, the splendid speech with his rich deep voice enthralled the vast audience. The thought of this warrior prophet of Bangladesh left a deep mark upon Bangladesh. Bangladesh thus have had the blessing of directly hearing a person of the stature of a great politician, radiating purity, compassion, and love.

Clearly, there have been very few politicians who have been able to match the respect and authority that he has been commanding.

He was a well-respected politician who is an out-of-the-box thinker and speaker. He approached topics from a unique point of view which made us to redefine our lives, personally and politically. Address is a cornerstone of Bangladesh history. His speech rallied a nation and set created a foundation of Bengali idealism for future generations.

These speeches lift hearts in dark times, give hope in despair, refine the characters of people, inspired brave feats, give courage to the weary, honour the dead, and change the course of history.

It is a fitting gift to Bangladesh and a reminder that politics can be attuned to be sensible, subtle and constructive, the way Monaem Sarker has been doing it since long.

Big salutes to Monaem Sarker. He is an exemplary leader who believes in what he wants to do, subscribe to what Awami League wants to do, and faithfully following it through. That, in a nutshell, he is a perfect gentleman politician in giving way to Bangladesh-styled leadership replenishing.

Anwar A. Khan is an independent political analyst based in Dhaka, Bangladesh who writes on politics, political and human-centred figures, current and international affairs

Movements Affirm That Imperialism Is in Decline, but Mass Struggle More Necessary Than Ever

All speakers in the gathering also declared their complete rejection of the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people and categorized Zionism as a brutal tool of U.S. imperialism.

Five hundred representatives from movements, unions, and parties hailing from countries across the world gathered in Caracas, Venezuela, for the World Gathering for a Social Alternative. The meeting, organized by the SimĂ³n BolĂ­var Institute for Peace and Solidarity and Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America – Peoples’ Trade Treaty (ALBA-TCP), kicked off on April 18 and concluded on April 20.

SimĂ³n BolĂ­var School vessel

During the first two days of debate and discussion, panelists and participants discussed the pressing tasks of the left and progressive movements to organize the masses and confront the climate crisis, the rise of the right, imperialist attacks, and fortify internationalist solidarity. Speakers also emphasized the relationship among progressive governments, political projects, and mass movements, and the need for greater levels of coordination and support.

The meeting held in the Bolivarian Republic comes just three months ahead of the presidential elections in the country, which have already been categorized by the U.S. government as “undemocratic” and have been used as a pretext to intensify its unilateral coercive measures against Venezuela. Speakers throughout the first two days of discussion emphasized the need to stand in solidarity with the Venezuelan people who for the last 10 years have been resisting under a tough U.S.-sanctions regime. Despite overwhelming challenges, they have continued to deepen their revolution.

All speakers in the gathering also declared their complete rejection of the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people and categorized Zionism as a brutal tool of U.S. imperialism.

from the Peoples Dispatch / Globetrotter News Service

Iran's Heartfelt Gesture to Sri Lanka: A Lesson in True Friendship and Respect

Deep underground, two turbines, named Sulochana and Dasuni, pay tribute to the unsung heroines who labored alongside engineers in a 300-meter abyss, a story of sacrifice and determination worthy of history's pages.

Editorial 

The age-old adage "a friend in need is a friend indeed" rings truer than ever in the enduring relationship between Iran and Sri Lanka. While geopolitical dynamics often dominate headlines, it's the quiet acts of solidarity and genuine camaraderie that truly define the strength of a bond. Amidst the hustle of global politics, Iran's recent gesture towards Sri Lanka exemplifies a profound respect and appreciation for the unsung heroes at the heart of a monumental project.

Uma Oya multipurpose development project

The Uma Oya project stands not only as a testament to bilateral cooperation but also as a beacon of hope for Sri Lanka's economic upliftment. With a capacity to generate 120 MW of electricity, it promises to energize communities and drive progress in a nation hungry for development. However, amidst the celebration of technological prowess, it's the narrative of humility and recognition that truly sets this project apart.

Buried beneath the surface, quite literally, lies a tale of dedication and perseverance. Two turbines, standing as silent sentinels of progress, bear the names of two remarkable individuals - Sulochana and Dasuni. These aren't just arbitrary labels; they are an homage to the unsung heroines who toiled alongside engineers and workers from the depths of a 300-meter abyss. It's a narrative of sacrifice and determination that deserves to be etched in the annals of history.

What enhances the significance of this gesture is the attention to detail and cultural sensitivity demonstrated by our Iranian allies, reflecting their profound respect for local customs and traditions, an affirmation of the depth of understanding and friendship between our nations in a world too often marked by misunderstandings and cultural insensitivity.

However, amidst the celebration of this remarkable gesture, it's crucial to reflect on the broader implications it carries. At a time when political grandstanding and self-promotion often overshadow genuine progress, Iran's example serves as a stark reminder of what true leadership and respect entail. While some leaders vie for attention and accolades, others choose to uplift those who work tirelessly behind the scenes, recognizing their invaluable contributions to the greater good.

As we eagerly anticipate the visit of Iranian President Ibrahim Raisi, let us not only extend a warm welcome but also take a moment to reflect on the values that bind our nations together. Beyond the realm of politics and diplomacy lies a deeper, more enduring bond built on mutual respect, understanding, and a shared commitment to progress. 

Elites in the Global North Are Scared to Talk About Palestine

College students across the United States have been trying desperately to raise awareness about what is happening in Gaza

by Vijay Prashad

Israeli bombs continue to fall on Gaza, killing Palestinian civilians with abandon. Al Jazeera published a story about the destruction of 24 hospitals in Gaza, each of them bombed mercilessly by the Israeli military. Half of the 35,000 Palestinians killed by Israel were children, their bodies littering the overwhelmed morgues and mosques of Gaza. The former United Nations assistant secretary-general for human rights Andrew Gilmour told BBC Newsnight that the Palestinians are experiencing “collective punishment” and that what we are seeing in Gaza is “probably the highest kill rate of any military, killing anybody, since the Rwandan genocide of 1994.” Meanwhile, in the West Bank section of Palestine, Human Rights Watch shows that the Israeli military has participated in the displacement of Palestinians from 20 communities and has uprooted at least seven communities since October 2023. These are established facts.

Children are seen among the rubble after an Israeli airstrike in central Gaza Strip city of Deir el-Balah, on April 2, 2024. (Xinhua)

Yet, these facts—according to a leaked memorandum—cannot be spoken about in the “newspaper of record” in the United States, the New York Times. Journalists at the paper were asked to avoid the terms “genocide,” “ethnic cleansing,” and “occupied territory.” Indeed, over the past six months, newspapers and television shows in the United States have generally written about the genocidal violence using passive voice: bombs fell, people died. Even on social media, where the terrain is often less controlled, the ax fell on key phrases; for instance, despite his professions of commitment to free speech, Elon Musk said that terms such as “decolonization” and phrases such as “from the river to the sea” would be banned on X.

Silence on the College Campuses

At the University of Southern California (USC), Asna Tabassum, a South Asian American, was to deliver an address on campus to 65,000 people as the valedictorian of the class of 2024. Involved in the conversation around the Israeli war against the Palestinians, Tabassum was targeted by pro-Israeli activists who claimed to feel threatened. On the basis of this feeling of endangerment, whose source the university refused to disclose, USC decided to cancel her speech. In a thoughtful response, Tabassum—who majored in biomedical engineering and history (with a minor in resistance to genocide)—implored her classmates “to think outside the box—to work towards a world where cries of equality and human dignity are not manipulated to be expressions of hatred. I challenge us to respond to ideological discomfort with dialogue and learning, not bigotry and censorship.” Tabassum is 21 years old. The USC provost who canceled her speech, Andrew Guzman, is 56 years old. His reasons for shutting her down are less mature than her plea for dialogue.

College students across the United States have been trying desperately to raise awareness about what is happening in Gaza and have sought to get their campuses to divest from companies with investments in Israel and in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Early protests were tolerated, but then U.S. politicians got involved with congressional hearings and rash comments about these students being funded by the Chinese and Russians. College administrators, afraid of their donors and of political pressure, buckled and began to censor the students from one end of the country (Columbia University) to the other (Pomona College). College presidents invited local police departments onto their campuses, allowed them to arrest the students, and suspended them from their colleges. But the mood is undeniable. Student unions across the country—from Rutgers to Davis—voted to force their administrations to divest from Israel.

What’s Repugnant?

On April 12, 2024, the Berlin police closed a Palestine conference that brought together people from across Germany to listen to a range of speakers, including from other parts of Europe and from Palestine. At the airport, the police detained and then deported the British-Palestinian doctor, Ghassan Abu Sitta, who had volunteered in Gaza and had witnessed the genocidal war firsthand. The former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis was to give an online speech at the conference. He was not only prevented from giving that speech, but also was issued a betätigungsverbot—or a ban from any political activity in Germany (ban from entry into Germany and a ban from doing an online event). This, Varoufakis said, is essentially the “death knell of the prospects of democracy in the Federal Republic of Germany.”

A few days before the conference in Berlin, Professor Jodi Dean published an essay on the Verso Blog called “Palestine Speaks for Everyone.” The essay is rooted in the simple, and unobjectionable, idea that oppressed people have the right to fight for their emancipation. This is the basis of the International Declaration of Human Rights, also cited frequently by Varoufakis. The day after the Palestine conference was shut down in Berlin, Jodi Dean’s employer, President Mark Gearan of Hobart and William Smith Colleges in the United States, published a statement announcing that Professor Dean cannot teach the rest of her classes this term. Gearan wrote that not only was he in “complete disagreement” with Dean, but he also found her comments to be “repugnant.” It is interesting that since October, Gearan has only released a public statement condemning Hamas, but nothing about the horrendous genocidal violence against the Palestinians.

What did Jodi Dean write that was so “repugnant”? Gearan focused on the word “exhilarating,” which Dean used to describe her reaction to paragliders that went beyond the Israeli occupation fence around Gaza. She did not actually celebrate the attacks of October 7, but merely used the paragliders as a metaphor to consider the politics of hope and liberation from a Palestinian standpoint (citing the last poem of Refaat Alareer, killed by Israel on December 6, 2023, with its meditation on kites to highlight the idea of soaring above oppression). Gearan did not want a dialogue about the occupation or about the genocide. Like the editors and publishers of the New York Times, like the German government, and like other U.S. college presidents, Gearan wanted to curtail conversation. Tabassum’s plea for “dialogue and learning” was muzzled; too scared to actually talk about Palestine, people like Gearan prefer “bigotry and censorship.”

Source: Globetrotter

UN Interventionism and the Inherent Hypocrisy

Mr. Franche, we implore you to focus on fulfilling your duties rather than indulging in politics at the expense of the victims of Easter Massacre in 2019.

Editorial

Sri Lanka has unfortunately become a platform where anyone and everyone feels entitled to air their grievances and baseless accusations, resembling a chaotic Hyde Park of sorts. The recent involvement of the United Nations’ top envoy to the country, Marc-Andre Franche, in commemorating the fifth anniversary of the Easter Sunday Carnage epitomises this trend. It’s perplexing to witness this event being labelled as a “celebration,” considering the profound tragedy it represents. Since the occurrence of this horrific event, there has b
een a blatant exploitation of victims’ sentiments by certain individuals, who have shamelessly capitalised on their suffering for personal gain. The true victims of this heinous act of Islamic fanaticism are left to mourn the loss of their loved ones, while others manipulate their suffering for their own agendas.

Mr. Marc-André Franche, the United Nations Resident Coordinator in Sri Lanka.

What’s even more disheartening is the lack of response from both the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and other local authorities regarding the unfounded accusations made by this UN official. It begs the question: what is the purpose of allocating substantial budgets to maintain such state officials if they fail to address matters crucial to our sovereignty and territorial integrity? Recall the previous allegations of war crimes levelled against Sri Lanka by UN officials, which were later retracted due to lack of evidence. Yet, the irony persists as the very individual behind these accusations was welcomed with open arms by our politicians, even granting him a platform in our parliament. This paints a grim picture of the reality on the ground.

It’s evident that the local representation of the United Nations merely echoes the sentiments of their superiors, without demonstrating any genuine commitment to transparency or accountability, be it in recruitment practices or other aspects of governance. Marc-Andre Franche has called upon Sri Lanka to address its “accountability deficit” and ensure justice as the nation commemorates the victims of its most tragic attack on civilians five years ago. However, before pointing fingers at others, he should first confront the “accountability deficit” within his own organisation. It’s essential to address internal issues before criticising external entities.

Recently, a self-proclaimed whistleblower, who was also under investigation for alleged criminal activities, made sensational claims on Easter attack on a British television channel a few days after he made his statement before United Nations agency to ensure his “asylum”. His lengthy statement aimed to target Sri Lankan and Indian officials, yet lacked a shred of evidence. Despite India’s swift action and warning against such defamation attempts, the situation in Sri Lanka took a different turn. Not only were these baseless allegations broadcasted, but efforts were made to sway public opinion as well. What’s more alarming is the recruitment of both the whistleblower and his accomplice by a UN agency just months before the documentary aired.

Did Mr. Franche know that the individual who aided the whistleblower was a medical doctor who provided assistance to Rilwan, the brother of Zahran, when he was admitted to Colombo National Hospital after an explosion incident in the East? Has anyone in your agency assisted the Sri Lankan government in locating this individual? Where does your “accountability deficit” truly lie? It’s worth noting that the so-called whistleblower was recruited by a UN agency and facilitated in fabricating his false statement to secure refugee status. Our inquiries to Mr. Franche’s office remain unanswered, highlighting a lack of honesty and transparency on their part. Yet, they have the audacity to lecture others on transparency and accountability.

It’s evident that due to various personal reasons, neither Sri Lanka’s diplomatic corps nor the mainstream media possess the spine to question the blatant hypocrisy of certain agencies and entities that flagrantly violate international agreements, including the Vienna Convention, by meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign nations. However, despite the reluctance of these parties, the truth remains apparent. Let us not forget the words of Jesus, as stated in John 8:7, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.” So, Mr. Franche, can you claim to be without any sin? We implore you to focus on fulfilling your duties rather than indulging in politics at the expense of the victims of these heinous crimes.

Israeli Spy Chief Resigns Amid Criticism Over Hamas Onslaught

Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva Steps Down Following October 7 Failures

Maj. Gen. Aharon Haliva, head of the Israel Defense Forces’s Military Intelligence Directorate, has tendered his resignation. This decision comes in the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas onslaught, a devastating attack that exposed critical failures within the IDF’s intelligence apparatus.

The head of the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate, Aman, Major General Aharon Haliva

Haliva’s resignation, announced on Monday, underscores the gravity of the lapses that allowed Hamas to carry out a brazen assault. Despite being coordinated with IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi and approved by Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, Haliva’s departure marks a rare instance of a senior IDF officer stepping down directly due to operational failures.

The October 7 attack, which saw some 3,000 Hamas-led terrorists breaching into southern Israel, resulted in a tragic loss of lives and widespread devastation. Haliva, acknowledging the shortcomings of his directorate, took full responsibility for failing to anticipate and warn of the impending threat posed by Hamas.

In his resignation letter addressed to Chief of Staff Halevi, Haliva emphasized the weight of responsibility that accompanies authority. He expressed deep remorse for the tragic consequences of the attack and pledged his support for a thorough investigation to uncover the factors contributing to the intelligence failure.

Haliva’s resignation coincides with ongoing investigations into the events leading up to the October 7 massacre. The IDF’s Intelligence Directorate has initiated probes spanning the period before the assault, focusing on the 36 hours preceding the onslaught and the attack itself. These inquiries seek to identify systemic weaknesses and improve future intelligence operations.