Jayalalitha to join fast in support of Sri Lankan Tamils




(September 30, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) A day after AIADMK supremo Jayalalithaa extended support to the CPI’s proposed fast on October 2 on the Sri Lankan Tamils’ issue, the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK) led by actor Vijayakanth also followed suit on Monday.

The fast is aimed at urging the Centre to halt the Lanka government’s military offensive against Tamils, stop any aid to Colombo and help bring about a negotiated settlement. Jayalalithaa’s decision to back the agitation has been welcomed by Tamil parliamentarians from the island nation, as they termed it a turning point in the two-decade-old ethnic strife.

Vijayakanth said DMDK’s presidium chairman Panruti S Ramachandran will take part in the fast in the city. The MDMK and the CPM are also joining the protest on Gandhi Jayanthi.

MDMK propaganda secretary and fiery speaker Nanjil Sampath told that Jayalalithaa’s support for the cause would send out a strong message to the Centre and international community that Tamil Nadu had not forgotten the Tamils of Sri Lanka. “The people of Tamil Nadu want a safe and secure life for their brethren in Lanka. Her support would nudge the Indian establishment to do something to end the brutal attacks on Tamils,” he remarked.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Death toll rises in temple stampede, 147 dead




(September 30, Jodhpur, Sri Lanka Guardian) At least 147 people have been killed and over 425 injured in a major stampede at the Chamunda Devi Temple in Jodhpur, Rajasthan, where devotees had gathered in large numbers on the occasion of the start of Navaratri.

A police official said there is difficulty in giving the exact figures as most of the people have taken the dead bodies of their near and dear ones fearing post-mortem.

At least 30 bodies have been brought to the Mahatma Gandhi Hospital at Jodhpur, while the remaining 10 were taken to the Mathura Das Hospital, Divisional Commissioner Kiran Soni Gupta was quoted by news agency PTI as saying.

Gupta confirmed that 80 people had indeed been killed.

Rajasthan Home Minister Gulab Chand Kataria said, "Enough police deployment was ensured to avoid an eventuality but the rush was just too much."

According to some eyewitnesses, a rumour of a bomb being planted in the temple was the reason that the stampede started.

It is feared the number of casualties may go up.

In August this year, a stampede outside the Naina Devi temple left 145 pilgrims dead.
Authorities have already ordered a probe into possible organisational lapses that led to a stampede outside the Naina Devi temple in Himachal Pradesh.

Rumours of a landslide had triggered that stampede. The pilgrims ran down a narrow mountain trail from the temple in Bilaspur district, only to meet thousands of people walking up in the opposite direction.

Most were trampled while dozens fell to their death after railings broke on the steep mountainside. More than 100 people were injured.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Our humanity can bind our cultures



by Saybhan Samat

(September 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The term culture has wide connotations. Presently it is used in different contexts and new interpretations for the term culture have gained currency. A few terms in vogue are culture of impunity, the culture of nakedness and the nakedness of culture, clash of cultures, hippy culture, mind culture and thuppai culture (of local origin).

It is widely accepted that culture is the integrated sum total of learned behavior and a way of life of a society. Our whole attitudes, behavior patterns and perceptions are conditioned by our culture. Culture will teach us who we are, where we come from, what we are to do and where we are going. Culture has two major components the material culture and the spiritual culture. Symbols, values, beliefs, emotions, laws, attitudes, materials possessions, aspirations, perceptions are the many facets of culture.

When talking about culture, it is important to make clear distinctions about what culture can and cannot do. Generally speaking, there cannot be no single culture, since culture, as generally understood by social scientists today, refers to the way of life a particular people at a particular time and place and how those people make meaning of the world. Culture also the social scientists believe have two dimension. The material dimension and the symbolic dimension. The material dimensions of culture refer to

arti-facts, behaviors and creative works that are passed down over time, often understood in terms of "tradition" or even "folk-lore," although "culture" gives a more inclusive way of talking about all that.

The second dimension of culture and the one that is more complex, is the symbolic dimension. This refers more or less to how people construct meanings of the world, how they interpret events, actions, ideas, this for the most part is present –oriented and complex. One can best apprehend the symbolic dimension of culture by living it more than only observing it.

Sri-Lanka Buddhists have to a great part inherited their culture from their religion Buddhism and to a lesser part from their customs and traditions. This is true of the Hindus, Christians and Muslims of the island too. Hence we are multi-cultural and will be compelled to resort to pluralism in order promote peace and harmony in an island that has suffered intractable war for over two and half decades which has devasted the inhabitants of our island with thousands suffering displacement and injury and 60,000+ dead. Hopefully once the war concludes the concept of pluralism should be promoted island-wide and be introduced in the curriculum of all schools. It should also be made compulsory for students to learn all three languages Sinhalese, Tamil and English. These measures will surely prevent any future cultural and ethnic clashes.

What is most likely to promote multi-culturalism and pluralism is to find our common humanity. Age old values cultivated by human beings if integrated and practiced in all cultures will bond the different cultures of this fair land and enhance all cultures into a sublime culture. May be it will be a step towards the melting- pot of all cultures to some degree at least. This exercise must necessarily be done by clergymen, teachers, political leaders and even ordinary people. This is the only way to prevent any future conflict. It is a challenge for every citizen of this country. We are duty- bound to bring serendipity, tranquility and peace to Sri-Lanka. Enough is enough of war and misery.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

International Elders’ Day




by Douglas Devananda

(September 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) We are of the belief that Elders are the pioneer citizens of the people. Getting an opportunity to issue a message on behalf of the International Day of the Elders’ that is commemorated every year, is to my great happiness.

It’s indeed a matter of great importance to mark a special day on your behalf. It certainly is, as a gesture of honour and appreciation for the invaluable services you have extended to the society. Honouring you, I believe, in essence is paying our homage to the beloved land of ours and to the human race as a whole.

Life attains its perfection only through experience. I therefore believe that the Elderly society is a massive source of knowledge where younger generation needed to be in constant contact for guidance.

Elders right throughout in their lives have been subjected to many a vicissitude like; difficulties, obstructions, challenges, sufferings, comforts, etc. and also have been subjected to experiences that can not be even thought of. Such experiences are essential to the youngsters for a better tomorrow.

Imparting your knowledge and experience concerning the value of human life, destruction caused by war, social deterioration, to the contemporary generation is a great service that could be rendered to our country and human society, I believe.

The youngsters of today will be the Elders tomorrow, having well understood this reality determination should be made to work with each other cordially.

Peace and harmony need to be brought to this land of ours forthwith, for this purpose it is necessary to work together shedding all the differences that fragment our society.

I am aware that the Elders are subjected to immense difficulties due to the prevalent disturbing situation in the country. I therefore wish the dawning of peace again in this country of ours and establishment of democracy in its truest form. I sincerely expect your willing contribution in its entirety towards this end.

I wish you all health and long life.

(The Writer is a Member of Parliament, Secretary General EPDP & Minister of Social Services and Social Welfare)
- Sri Lanka Guardian

General Fonseka Never Said Sinhala Only, Or did He?




by Thomas Johnpulle


(September 30, London, Sri Lanka guardian) Expressing oneself is not a crime; in fact it is a right of every individual. In every society there are limitations placed by law and custom against certain forms of expressions. However, the ambit of freedom afforded is far greater than what is restricted. General Sarath Fonseka would never have thought that his statement to the Canadian National Post will stir up a controversy. What did he say? He said Sri Lanka belongs to the Singhalese. Did he say Sri Lanka belongs only to the Singhalese? Nope. Although it would have been better had he phrased it to convey that Sri Lanka belongs to all Sri Lankans, his statement still holds true. For example, the statement “all tigers are quadrupeds” doesn’t mean all the quadrupeds are tigers. It means tigers are quadrupeds.

He must be fully aware that there are Tamils, Muslims and others serving alongside the Singhalese in the army. If for some reason Sri Lanka belongs only to the Singhalese, what are the others doing in the army? Obviously it is not so as he conveyed in the same interview at length; this country belongs to people of all races.

Therefore demanding punishment for General Fonseka is not a wise move as he has not committed a crime, hasn’t said anything nasty and hasn’t made a derogatory remark at the very least. He was saved by the Almighty for a good reason when a suicide bomber severely injured him in 2006. He must be allowed to complete his job.

Jesus used to teach people with parables and the parable of the sower is an important one. According to that a sower throws seeds in many different grounds. Those seeds that fell by the way side were eaten by fouls while those that fell on rock couldn’t grow well and eventually died. Those seeds that fell by the way side were eaten by fowls while those that fell on rock couldn’t grow well and eventually died down, but, those that fell in fertile ground grew to give an abundant harvest. Although Jesus likened it to the reception of different individuals to the (same) word of God, the opposite is also true. An assumed tribal statement gets implanted only in the minds fertile enough to make a seedling out of such a statement. It failed to create anything in the minds of most Sri Lankans.

Nevertheless his superiors have complete faith in him and there is simply no chance of them taking any action against him. That doesn’t affect the warfront because most of those concerned about his statement never supported a military resolution anyway. Had he said something inappropriate (not incomplete), the government would be seriously considering action against him, if his statement divided the pro-war camp. A split in the anti-war camp simply doesn’t concern the government as it cannot affect the war.

However, it would have been better had the Army Commander made a politically correct statement in the likes of what politicians regularly make. May be its time he start speaking what Sri Lankans want to hear through actions rather than words.

( The Writer can be reached at trjohnpulle@yahoo.co.uk )
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Two LTTE boats destroyed off Pooneryn, eight sea tigers killed



(September 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The elite Special Boat Squadron (SBS) sailors of Sri Lanka Navy attacked and destroyed two LTTE assault boats, appeared off Pooneryn Sea last night and killed at least eight sea tiger cadres, the Defence Ministry said.

Navy boats patrolling in the area detected the two terror boats moving close to the coast from Pooneryn to Kalmunai point (K-point) around 11 PM and sailors launched a surprise attack, the Defence Ministry said.

All eight LTTE cadres onboard were confirmed killed in the attack. A search operation has been launched in the area, the Defence Ministry added.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

To the Friendly Democrats of the Canadian Democratic League.



by Charles.S.Perera

(September 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) It is an interesting experience to encounter a League of Democrats, after expressing your point of view on a subject, which is contrary to their point of view. You at once become, for them, a racist, a petit little Hitler arising from the debris of the World War II, or a senile"ga ga"

All that would be, because one says that there is truth in what the Army Commander said. It takes very few words of supporting the fact of the Sinhala being the majority, for a Tamil person championing even "democracy", to turn around and accuse the person as a racist, and a petty little Hitler. To-day , more than half a century after that cruel war there is none who would even pretends to be a Democrat, compare his worst adversary to a Hitler of the holocaust. That itself smears the word "democracy", by which one pretends to emerge as a league for peace and freedom.

Even the Army Commander is permitted to have his personal opinion, and express it when the occasion arises, without being accused for having exercised his human right of the freedom of speech. When the Army Commander spoke of the Sinhala majority he was not speaking of the Sri Lankans. The Sri Lankans is the larger entity, that includes all the Communities living in Sri Lanka, without reference to their status of being the majority or the minority.

The Commander of the Army takes orders from the Head of State, and therefore he is not a politician, hence his opinions are not taken as having political significance. Therefore, what the Army Commander Lt. Gl. Sarath Fonseka said when interviewed by a news paper reporter cannot be construed as political.

The elimination "business", is the act of removing or getting rid of something. What Hitler did was extermination, killing in extermination camps. Therefore the latter is no parallel to the former, which is to remove what has become a danger to the unity of the people, and the territorial unity of the country.

Mr. Perera sees no terrorists in all those who are Tamils out side the terrorists, against whom a " war" is being waged in the north. But sees those who help directly and indirectly to support terrorism as helping the terrorists to commit all sins to arrive at their sinister object of partitioning the country to set up their Tamil Eelam.

It is strange that when a Sinhala speaks about his Community, or defends another Sinhala against false accusations, he is immediately called a racist. But the Tamils when they call all lowly names against the Sinhala, it is merely the Tamil minority vindicating their political rights and civil liberties. They may hate Sinhala and do all they can to demean and degrade them, but they do not call themselves racists, because they think it is their right to do so because of their situation as minorities.
Frankly we do not know the Canadian Democratic league, but the tone of the article defending their statement, against some one who contests the facts in it are, I am afraid, not very democratic.

What is best for the Canadian Democratic League to do is to stop calling every one who opposes their point of view a racist. And be a bridge to bring the communities together in a more positive way, without being bitter and aggressive. This reminds me of a saying in Sinhala that even if the tiger changes its stripes it still remains a tiger.

The Sinhala people are the majority, whether one likes it or not but the Sinhala do not say this to dominate over other communities. The Sinhala people have lived in friendship with other communities for generations , and will continue to do so in future. They do not claim any special privileges over and above their fellow compatriots. But The Sinhala people as much as the Tamil, and Muslim people, wants to live in peace and harmony with all those who share this motherland of ours-to make a happy Nation of Sri Lankans.

I wish with all sincerity that the Canadian Democratic League prospers and develops into a strong League to bring the Tamil diaspora to participate with other Leagues and Associations in Sri Lanka, to make bonds of unity to make one family of all Communities in our common Motherland. It is normal when one is young and exuberant one sees senility-the "ga ga" in others, but with time and wisdom they will be the future Ambassadors of peace and contribute for unity and prosperity of our Nation.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Devananda Pays To Vocational Training Centre For The Disabled




(September 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Douglas Devananda, Minister of Social Services and Social Welfare, paid a surprise visit to the Vocational Training Centre at Seeduwa on the last 27th where disable youths from all parts of the Island are receiving training in various vocations.
This Vocational Training Centre, commenced by the Missionaries in 1948 was handed over later to the Ministry of Social Services and Social Welfare, since then it has been managed by this Ministry. At present there are about 120 disable resident youths receiving training here. The Minister queried many officials attached to the centre as he had been reported of many a shortcoming concerning its administration.

The Training Centre stretches over an area of 14 acres and it is the only training institute in the Island imparting training to the disable youths. Training in 14 disciplines including computer technology, carpentry and handicraft are covered here.The Minister after having queried the employees of the institute as well as the trainees expressed his intention of taking steps deemed necessary for development of the Centre. Having inspected the water supply system, electricity supply and building shortcomings he instructed the officials to resort to immediate action for regularizing them. The Minister also contacted, the Secretary of the Ministry of Highways to design an effective drainage system to the Centre to rid of the excess rain water flowing to the premises due to haphazard constructions carried out in the area. The Minister instructed the officials to look into the food supply, shortcomings of kitchen utensils and equipment and raw materials needed for training programmes.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Why America Should Listen to Ahmadinejad?



The Iranian President Makes More Sense Than Bush, McCain or Obama


by Paul Craig Roberts


(September 30, Washington, Sri Lanka Guardian) The full text of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s speech to the UN General Assembly last week was printed in the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz (9-25-08).

Although our Founding Fathers would have comprehended and endorsed Ahmadinejad’s speech to the United Nations, present-day Americans would find it strange should they happen to hear about it.

Unlike their forbears, Americans today live a material life, not a spiritual one. Americans are far too likely to dismiss Ahmadinejad’s words about obeisance to God and justice as the mumbo-jumbo of an “Islamist extremist.”

The hubris of Americans and their belief in U.S. “exceptionalism” would cause them to reject Ahmadinejad’s holding the US, its NATO puppets, and Israel accountable before the UN General Assembly. So successfully has Ahmadinejad been demonized by the propagandistic US media that his speech would be dismissed out of hand by the arrogance of those who regard themselves as the salt of the earth.

Ahmadinejad echos the statements of other world leaders when he says that US power is rapidly waning. The US “superpower” is dependent on foreigners for its financing. The US cannot exist without Chinese financing, just as Europe cannot exist without Russian energy. America’s European puppet regimes are rethinking the consequences of serving US hegemony.

A “superpower” that cannot subdue Iraq and Afghanistan cannot subdue Russia and China. Do Americans and their neocon leaders believe that China and Russia will lend the US the money to finance a war against themselves? Do they believe that Russia will keep America’s NATO puppets supplied with energy if American aggression against Russia intensifies?

Warnings about America’s financial dependency on foreigners have been ignored.

The bailout of the US financial system is entirely dependent on the willingness of the Chinese, Saudis, and other foreigners to use their trade surpluses with the US to purchase the US Treasury instruments that must be sold in order to raise the money for Bush’s bailout of the financial institutions.

The bailout of the US government’s budget has been going on for years, and it takes place every time the US Treasury holds an auction of new American debt. But now the bailout by foreigners of the US government is starting to turn into much larger sums that carry much higher risks.

Last week the Financial Times reported that Peer Steinbruck, the Finance Minister of Germany, said that the American financial crisis was “a fundamental rupture” and that “the US will lose its status as the superpower of the world financial system.”

Steinbruck is being charitable. The US lost that status when it became dependent on foreigners to finance American consumption of foreign goods and US goods and services produced offshore in addition to the war-swollen budget deficits of the US government. Indeed, foreigners finance Americans’ home mortgages. The Chinese alone hold about $400 billion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bonds.

Is Ahmadinejad correct in his view that, with the waning of American hegemonic power, the world is on the verge of a better, more humane, and more just world? I wonder. Many Americans think of themselves as hard-nosed realists. They believe that it is a dog-eat-dog world: We have to get “them” before they get us. This paranoid view is the basis of US foreign and military policy. It holds that America must not only have the military power to overwhelm any combination of possible enemies, but also America must prevent the rise of any country or countries that could challenge American power. This is a “diplomacy” without any concept of peaceful coexistence or good will among men. Yet, Americans think of themselves as a Christian nation.

Neocons and macho Republicans think we don’t win our wars because we lack the balls to use enough force. They believe that the US should nuke every country that doesn’t follow our orders. Indeed, many American “conservatives” are lusting for the US to nuke a country in order “to teach the world a lesson.”

To accommodate this blood-lust, the Bush Pentagon revised US war doctrine to permit preemptive nuclear attack even upon non-nuclear-armed countries. During the long cold war, preemptive nuclear attack was not a US option.

Which vision of the future will win out? Ahmadinejad’s policy of peaceful co-existence or neoconservative desires for American world dominance? The chance is too high for comfort that the hubris and arrogance of the United States will lead to a nuclear confrontation that will destroy the world.

People of good will hope that Ahmadinejad and Steinbruck’s views will prevail and that the rest of the world will wake up and ask if they want to continue financing America’s hegemonic ventures that threaten life on earth. The day the foreign bankers turn off the credit spigot to the US Treasury, American arrogance will be tamed.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions. He can be reached at: PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com
- Sri Lanka Guardian

India: We Created The Fascists



All parties, especially the socialists, must unite to defeat the BJP

by U.R. Ananthamurthy

(September 30, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) WHEN I write to account for the BJP’s rise to power, particularly in Karnataka, I need, as a socialist, to introspect. I want to examine which actions of my mentors, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia and Loknayak Jayaprakash Narayan (JP), led to the transformation of the Sangh Parivar from a cadre-based, relatively contained outfit to a mass party that has retained its secretive cadre base.

Gandhiji wanted the Congress party dissolved after Independence so it would not cash in on its role in the fight for freedom but would make room for all parties to compete in a non-violent, democratic way. Had things gone as he envisaged, Jawaharlal Nehru would have formed a socialist, democratic party and Sardar Patel and C Rajagopalachari a conservative one. We would still have had a nationalist Savarkarian Hindutva party, but it would not have had much space of its own, for that would have been occupied by the conservatives. With their Gandhian background, the conservatives would have been traditional in outlook but largely secular in principle.

This did not happen and, for 30 years after Independence, the Congress seemed rock-like to the people of India. Lohia thought India politics needed to gain momentum and that people should know they could change their rulers. In opposition to the Congress were small parties with a conglomeration of different ideologies, almost like Hinduism — some socialist, some conservative, some even non-secular in their practice. Lohia wanted to create a climate of what he called non-Congressism, which would take shape through an electoral understanding across the opposition so it could take on the Congress which, too, did not have a specific ideology of its own.

Then came the Emergency and, though JP was the anti-Congress movement’s spiritual leader, the well-organised Sangh Parivar was in the forefront of the struggle. With the Jana Sangh’s merger into the Janata Party, the Sangh Parivar began to acquire its mass base. However, the former Jana Sanghis’ dual membership of both the RSS and the Janata Party became an issue, and Morarji Desai’s government fell. George Fernandes, who was guided by Madhu Limaye, played an important role in this. Now, paradoxically, he has done everything he could to give the BJP a respectable place in Indian politics.

JP once remarked in anger that if the RSS was seen as a fascist organisation by some of his followers, he too could be considered a fascist. But the non-Jana Sangh members of the Janata Party always had a problematic relationship with the Sangh section, even during the struggle against the Emergency.

But non-Congressism still seemed to work and, in 1989, VP Singh formed a government with the support of the reincarnated Jan Sangh, the BJP. Earlier, in 1983, Ramakrishna Hegde had also come to power in Karnataka with their support. When JH Patel, a Lohia follower, formed the government in the state, all seemed well until he and Gowda developed serious differences. In 1999, the Janata Dal broke again: Patel allied with the BJP and Gowda led the secular Janata Dal, the JD(S).

In 2004, the JD(S) chose to support the Congress over the BJP to form the state government, but this did not work. Then, in 2006, Gowda’s son Kumaraswamy joined hands with the BJP. Did he have his father’s support? In the beginning, it seemed the son had defied his father, but later on the father blessed the son. As coalition partners, the JD(S) and the BJP agreed to alternate the chief minister’s post after 20 months. When Kumaraswamy’s term ended, he refused to make way for the BJP’s Yeddyurappa. While all the media reported the issue as one of “a transfer of power”, it was only a change in the chief minister’s post. How could it be otherwise when the BJP was also in power even when under Kumaraswamy? Kumaraswamy’s backtracking was seen by most people as unethical. Here is another important point: Yeddyurappa is a Lingayat and Kumaraswamy a Vokkaliga. The lingering rivalry for power between these two, largely land-owning, ‘middle’ communities was inflamed.

High drama followed. Yeddyurappa fails to get the CM’s post and walks away. He goes to Tumkur for a big anti-JD(S) rally, but rushes back to Bengaluru when Kumaraswamy says he wants to make peace. But now Kumaraswamy has conditions the BJP can’t accept. They walk away once again and President’s Rule is imposed on Karnataka.

ITHINK THE BJP fully cashed in on this in this election. The Lingayats are well organised through their mutts, which have done excellent work in social service and education. A 12th century radical poet-activist and saint, Basava still inspires the community. Not only Lingayats but all of us writers look to Basava as a major literary figure.

The BJP is in power now with its communal agenda and with financial backing from the mine owners. They must now be thinking of the coming general election, and how to build their Hindu votebank. Taking their cue from Orissa, they are now attacking churches. The Bajrang Dal and VHP and other such groups appear to be leading the attacks. Until the Centre issued a firm warning to the government, the BJP pretended there were only a few demonstrations against conversion.

What is probably happening now is this: the extremist element in the Sangh Parivar is disgruntled, for Yeddyurappa has ignored party loyalists and made ministers those who joined the BJP after the elections. This element may be looking for a ruthless Modi-like leader to replace Yeddyurappa, who has himself occasionally hinted at this. There is a lesson here. If you nurture a militant fundamentalist group to gain power, it will the moment it can, turn against you.

How do we reverse this? All parties opposed to fundamentalism have to unite, come to an electoral understanding and defeat the BJP. We must undo what JP and Lohia did.

Devegowda, an energetic politician, seems currently to be spearheading the fight against the BJP’s communal agenda. Those who were bitterly critical of his ‘bargaining’, first with the Congress and later with the BJP, are watching him closely. Is he truly repentant? Will the ‘third force’ in Indian politics remain genuinely a third force or will it wait to see whom to join, Congress or BJP, when another election returns another fractured verdi

UR Ananthamurthy is a Jnanpith awardee and a leading writer and contemporary critic.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

57 expands its tentacles


by Long Ranger

(The writer can be reached through his blog the SF -3 )

(September 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) After 57 successfully captured MALLAVI and UYILANKULAM on the 22nd of August 08, displaying immense flexibility and manoeuvrability the focus of 57 shifted to the A9 trunk road. The triple assault on the SFHQ-W on the 9th of September 08 at VAVUNIYA made the battleplanners shift their focus towards the A9, which was used to tow the Tamil Tiger heavy guns and possibly to make one of their Zling-143 aircraft airborne.

With the Tamil Tiger main defence line already running from NACHCHIKUDA to West of AKKARAYANKULAM, they set about with hectic preparations to extend their earth bund towards the East of AKKARAYANKULAM to prevent 57 from reaching the outskirts of KILINOCHCHI. To seize the initiative early on from the Tamil Tigers, troops attached to 571 were dispatched with two main objectives at hand:

1. Cut off the AKKARAYANKULAM-TERUMURIKANDI road

2. Thereby cutting off any supplies running towards AKKARAYANKULAM, and encircle the AKKARANKULAM tank thus outflanking the staunch Tamil Tiger defences based west of AKKARAYANKULAM. This also relieves the pressure on 58 Division battling the same earth bund running between NACHCHIKUDA to KARAMBAKULAM.

While 571 is faced with these objectives, 572 from KOKAVIL and 573 from MANKULAM are tasked with cutting off the A9 to prevent the Tamil Tigers from exploiting the A9 to bring vital security installations under its artillery range and bringing in supplies to its VAVUNIYA front. With this move the 57 Division is very well poised to capture two major hubs of the Tamil Tigers. If KOKAVIL is of political value, MANKULAM is of the highest military value for it is a vital junction that connects the A9 to the A34 that runs through dense MULATIVU jungles towards the North East. The overall military gain of this move is the denial of the A9 from KOKAVIL to MANKULAM to the Tamil Tigers. With the cut off of the A9 from the North, the 56 and 62 Divisions further South battling the Tamil Tigers are expected to find a depleted resistance and ease through the territory once the Tamil Tiger defences flood away on its own due to the lack of vital supplies and medevacs.

With one of the priorities being to filter out civilians as much as from the Wanni hinterland before a final onslaught, thus far the battleplanners have left the A9 as a conflict free zone. This is to make sure the civilians moving towards the OMANTHAI entry/exit point to be free of hassle as well as to ensure the smooth flow of humanitarian aid.

With the current developments taking shape on the A9 from MANKULAM onwards, aid agencies are expected to take the A34 towards MULATIVU avoiding the current conflict zones. This move also highlights the likely areas where a major military thrust is likely to take place.

With the Tamil Tigers fast losing its vast swathes of territory it once had, its VIPs and valuable assets are now confined to a limited land area - namely the dense MULATIVU forest. Using the knowledge of Tiger guerilla doctrine, the capability of modern weapon systems/platforms and the laws of elimination, the day of the dreaded decapitation strikes for the Tamil Tigers that will eliminate their once invincible leaders once and for all is not far off. Only time will tell...
- Sri Lanka Guardian

A word to Vanni Terrorist Proxi Party MP, about his Ethnocentric Military Dictatorship.



by Charles.S.Perera

(September 29, Paris, Sri Lanka Guardian) Selvam Adaikkalanathan the TNA MP writes an article in TamilNet on 28 September,2008 on an "Ethnocentric military dictator ship in the Making in Colombo" only a warped mind like his could imagine. But, he cannot envisage the extent of the damage caused to the aspirations of the Tamil people, who followed a bunch of market magicians, who promised to materialise a kingdom for them , with the flutter of a magic wand.

In the excerpt of the statement referred to the Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka, to the Canadian National Post, there is nothing extraordinary for the Tamil or Muslim MPs and others, to make such a brouhaha. On the other hand, the Army Commander has made it without any animosity to any one, like a wise person who has had terrible experience of life.

He has in those words quoted by Adaikkalanathan, expressed with emotion how he feels close to the minorities- who are like our people in no way different from us. It is difficult for Mr.Adaikkalanathan, with the mind he has, to read correctly into those words which enwrap human sentiments. Being so petty Mr. Adaikkalanathan sees in those words; an undermining of democracy by justifying an ethnic majoritarian rule in the island of Sri Lanka, and also alluding a military dictatorship in the making in Colombo.

And he dares, ask the President as the Commander-in-Chief to instruct the Army Commander to apologise for the statement. The question we ask this, TNA MP who seems, to have fallen from the last rain is whether, he asked the Army Commander to pardon him (TNA –being a proxy party to the Terrorists), for the suicide bomb attack which nearly cost the Commander's life ? That was worse than the statement alluded to the Army Commander, for which this TNA MP, dares demand an apology.

As for Hakeem's statement I wouldn't touch it even with a long pole. The individual concerned is not worth the words of good sense, one would put down on virgin white paper.

This TNA MP with a long name, and a short memory speaks of an agenda of ethnic cleansing, having already forgotten how his "thalaivar" got rid of the Muslims from Jaffna in 24 hours. The concerns of the Sri Lanka Judiciary he mentions in support of his imagined agenda of ethnic cleansing, is not above criticism, showing its hasty exhibition of judicial independence. The removal of check points, which enabled the transport of explosives and terrorist black tigers in to the south, and restrictions on checking on persons who have taken temporary residence in slum areas were not " people protecting " decisions of the Sri Lanka judiciary.

The Tamils in residence in the Army Commanders " Sinhala country", are not a comparison to the innocent Tamil people who were living in the so called former " terrorist controlled areas". Those people who are now in the camps of the IDPs are perhaps better off, than they were in the gun toting terrorists held areas.

Mr.Adaikkalanathan who is a TNA MP taking orders from his "thalaivar"-the terrorist leader Prabhakaran, is only a person authorized to act and speak for the terrorist " thalaivar".

Hence, he cannot speak a language different from that pronounced by his "thalaivar ". Therefore, his pleadings will only be accepted by any intelligent person with a"pinch of salt".
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Service above self



"God gave us the power to do all things but not to abuse his creations and crush the spirit of our fellow human beings. He wanted us to have the joy and pleasure of enabling all things around us to be beautiful and plenty. We have misused these blessings and set the course of this earth on the path of disaster."

by Victor Karunairajan

(September 29, Toronto, Sri Lanka Guardian) I can do all things through the power that strengthens me – Philippians 4:13

Genesis 1:27: “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” Then he blessed them and charged them to have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth. What an enormous responsibility he entrusted to man virtually to be almost God on earth and among mortals like him but eventually assured of immortal life in eternity.

He even gave man, the male and the female and nearly all of His creations to create life to be like them and foster their species.

He wanted man to be “fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and subdue it (Genesis 1:28). This is the story of creation, the history of the heavens and the earth. Lord God made the earth and the heavens, Genesis 2:5-6 before any plant of the field was in the earth and before any herb of the field had grown. For the Lord God had not caused it to rain on the earth, and there was no man to till the ground, but a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground.

This creation story sounds virtually like God seconding man whom he created in His own image to be godlike on earth, have dominion over His creations and multiply. Dominion over something and make that fruitful respecting all of God’s creations demands good leadership, committed and dedicated to treat all of God’s creations as hallowed and sacred.

This can only be possible for the one who has control over all things that needed to become fruitful to be true to the image of God; to be Godlike. But we see how man has fouled up God’s creations over centuries of time and today these are in danger of being destroyed. In fact, man’s destruction of God’s creations have been constant and as is best described in Hindu scriptures, we are now in the Kaliyuga, the era of the greatest evil to beset the humankind.

Jesus arrived amidst us as the promised redeemer Son of God to give man whom God created in his image, a chance to survive with a sacrifice so great that only the greatest expression of love can offer. But man has abused this love, this privilege, this offer of sacrifice so that God’s creations can be beautiful and plentiful as they were intended at the time of creation. In Hindu philosophy this act of God was conceived in the dance that boomed in brilliance, the sound that became flesh, perfect and rich in rhythms that holds the universe together and melody that gives all the loveliness and sweetness to the humankind.

St John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Two thousand years ago, apart from how Jesus was treated by man we also see how people who take up the cross are abused by man. He overstepped what was deeded to him by God and wanted to seek power and clout by being a destructive force to have improper and unacceptable dominion over his fellow men and all of creations. He was willed only to create and enjoy his fruits and not to destroy and savagely dominate his fellow beings.

We have created for ourselves a situation where we want to be powerful, seek personal popularity, and lead a life of false fads and pleasures that are catered by the seedy, sordid and squalid. When we have the skills and ability to share and make the world around us stable and fruitful we want to use them to dominate others into conquered, controlled and subjugated beings.
Some even go to the extent of creating strange and satanic cults to have total dominance over their followers entrapped in bizarre beliefs and creepy concepts.


God gave us the power to do all things but not to abuse his creations and crush the spirit of our fellow human beings. He wanted us to have the joy and pleasure of enabling all things around us to be beautiful and plenty. We have misused these blessings and set the course of this earth on the path of disaster.

In his Letter to the Philippians St Paul stated that regardless of the circumstances one may find himself, we can have real joy by living wholeheartedly for Christ our Redeemer God and selflessly for others. We cannot seek power like the wolves in a predator and prey relationship with an insatiable thirst for power and greed very much like what the corporate enterprise has foisted on humanity in current times. In the world of the corporations profits come from destruction of earth’s great resources that are essential to be sustained in good order for the health of the earth and the well being of humanity.

Our fine sensations are fast losing their wholesome and human elements and the joy of good relationships. Our power, position and clout are reckoned in the sleaze and the depravities we pursue as social essentials of our lives and acceptance by fellow human beings as people of considerable consequence that hold the whips that determine our lives.

But this is not the image God created man. He created him in His own image and commanded him to have dominion over all of his creations. Many have taken the path of destruction.
Man must seek his Maker. Only then man truly becomes a man. When man sees his Creator or catches a glimpse of what he was intended to be, he will see the reason and appreciate why he was created in the first place. This demands that we have to accept that we are all servants of each other and our commitment must be totally selfless. This is what St Paul emphasized in his Letter to the Philippians.

We must always be attuned to what we may give up so that others may be blessed. Jesus stripped himself of his divine rights and agonized immensely to show man the path for his deliverance from his evil ways and inherit the love of God. The chasm between God and man has to be bridged. When Jesus was asked about the two greatest commands, He said that would be to love God and love others.

What is very significant about St Paul’s Letter to the Philippians was at that time he was rotting in a dingy little hole of a Roman jail chained to a Roman security guard and in extreme poor health. An apostle who was bound by the will of God was in the chains of man. He had every reason to be bitter, angry and forlorn. Yet his Letter to the Philippians was one of hope; indeed a treatise of joy. In Chapter 4, verse 13, he reflects his unshaken faith: “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.”

And we his followers and the recipients of His love are called to do the same. That is what motivated Jesus and what should motivate us. God views service and humility as strengths, not weaknesses. ENDS
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Charles S Perera goes "ga ga"



Canadian Democratic League with a racist tirade

by Ajanthan Ratnam and Kumar Ariyaratne

(September 29, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The Canadian Democratic League has written to the Sri Lanka Guardian website on the 28 September, 2008, condemning a statement made by the Army Commander General Sarath Fonseka. And Charles S Perera with an outburst of extreme racist liturgy says it has got it all wrong.

He says that the Army Commander's observations were not political, he need not withdraw his statement and he has been entrusted to liberate the areas held by the terrorists and also to eliminate them.

He also refers to the Sinhala majority and never as Sri Lankans giving the impression that this land of ours belong more to the majority and less to the also beings, the minorities.

What is this elimination business Charles Perera is talking about? Do we see a petty little Adolf Hitler resurged from the debris of the Second World War?

Mr Perera sees all Tamil Diaspora as terrorists? Equally for nearly fifty years all Sinhalese have been seen as racists by the Tamils. It is simply because tiny minorities from both communities have hijacked the ship of state and are sailing on the ocean of communal discord.

The large majority of Sri Lankans are fed up with what has been happening in the country so long. And they are helpless and scared out of their wits by people like Charles Perera.

What does Mr Perera know about the Canadian Democratic League? Has he tried to find out why it was created and how it has performed against all odds and risks because of its anti-LTTE stand? It is a Sri Lankan Diaspora organization and was the first and indeed the only one to raise alarms about human rights violations by the LTTE.

It is people like Charles Perera who keep the racist fires burning. Lt General Sarath Fonseka made an odious comment about the Tamils.

He is there to fight an anti-terrorist war for the Sri Lankans and not for the Sinhala majority. He is there to save and protect the civilians and liberate them from the terrorists and most of the civilians there are Tamils who have been subjected to terrible ordeals by the LTTE. They were thrown into this den by a visionless and heartless Cease Fire Agreement engineered by the government.

Mr Charles Perera must understand that the armed forces are entrusted to fight a war for the people of Sri Lanka and make their lands and homes safe and not to eliminate them.

He must also not forget that what is sauce for the goose could be the same for the gander too but that is not what we want.

We certainly do not want such simple solutions that rule the minds of such simple people some of whom had become the world’s terrifying bullies and killers. These are historical facts.

Sri Lanka is a land of the people of Sri Lanka. They are Sinhalese, Tamils, Muslims, Malays and Burghers. It does not matter who is in the majority and who are the minorities; they are Sri Lankans. Lt General Sarath Fonseka, hitherto a good officer, has made a comment that cannot be acceptable coming as it does from a man who has been entrusted to liberate the people of Wanni from the LTTE. ENDS
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Silence of the American Pulpit



A comment on one of the early books of Bishop Sabapathy Kulandran, as a tribute on his 108 birthday – September 23, 2008. It was first published in 1949 by Pilgrim Press.

by Patrick Ratnaraja

(September 29, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The title “Silence of the American Pulpit” attracted my attention even when I was a student at Jaffna College and that is why I have kept this book as one of my proud possessions for years. Even today, I turn to its pages whenever I needed to have some inspiration that has been our grandpa to us from our childhood.

This is a book full of great anecdotes that must have inspired him and marked his personality a great deal especially in his relationship with others. I was told that whenever he presided at meetings especially the Jaffna Diocesan Council sessions, he tided effortlessly over all kinds of situations with anecdotes that he would relate with darts of wit and kegs of meanings apt for the occasion; and grace was his forte.

In his book, the American pulpit certainly seems silent and it is Indian philosophy that has marked presence and effect. Here and there he has made passing references to life in the States that portrays that silence. On the question of rights and privileges he observed while all men are regarded as equal by the American Constitution, all men are never regarded as equally law-abiding, equally intelligent, equally clean or equally healthy.

India’s place in history was appositely defined when he said she “was old when antiquity was young.” India he said is a synthesis of tremendous diversities and contrasts. India has one of the earliest books extant in the world, viz. the Rig Veda. Its literature in its various languages is one of the richest in all human history.

Evidently Bishop Kulandran was inspired to write Silence of the American Pulpit for an American audience at a time people in the West had all sorts of wrong notions about India. It was also the time the historic efforts to bring the protestant churches in India together were making rapid progress and by the time the book was published, the Church of South India had become a reality.

In India, he said “have lived men and women who have wrought great and noble deeds. Poetry, epigram, and proverb through many centuries have here sounded many appeals for virtue, truth, and honour. Hers is an immemorial tradition that has preferred the higher values of life to the coarser and more material ones. Here are enough theories about the ultimate to give occupation to most sophisticated mind. Here is a religious devotion one seldom sees anywhere else. Here is a kindness that has become proverbial. These things were there before Christianity came in, and they can be there even if the last Christian leaves her shores.”

Commenting on the enthusiasm of an earlier era that sprang from the belief in the superiority of everything western which has rather dwindled through the educative process, he said that path of history is strewn with discarded institutions. “Tradition and sentiment are not sufficient warranty for existence.”

But he asserts quite categorically: “As far as the church is concerned even mere usefulness is not sufficient justification for its existence. The claims of the church are such that there could be only two alternatives. It is either irreplaceable or it is a pompous hoax.”

Silence of the American Pulpit is an inspirational, easy to read and understand book. It shows how Bishop Kulandran has brought to bear the realism that many issues have engaged the minds of people through centuries of time with intense devotion and loyalty. They were issues that inspired them and for these, people went willingly into exile, imprisonment, torture or death.

We all have to take a stand on some issues and that includes the church too and other such institutions as well. Courtesy: JDCSI Newsletter - September
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Bomb Attack on Human Rights Lawyer and Civic Activist indicative of a dangerous trend



A statement released by the National Peace Council is follows;

(September 29, Colombo, Sri Lanka guardian) On Saturday night an unidentified gang lobbed two hand grenades at the residence of Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL) Director and Attorney at-Law J.C Weliamuna. Mr. Weliamuna’s residence is located in close proximity to a police station (Kohuwela), and an army camp (Kohuwela-Pepiliyana road. The attack demonstrates the blatant disregard criminals now have for regular structures of law and order.

The National Peace Council of Sri Lanka condemns the grenade attack on the residence of J C Weliamuna. The NPC views this attack as part of a broader assault on human rights, good governance, accountability and integrity in public life and thus demands stern action be taken against those responsible. We are particularly saddened by this attack as it had taken place at night, when his family and two young children were present. Mr Weliamuna has been a colleague and partner in work we are doing. We appreciate his courage and commitment to the rule of law and to integrity in public life.

Mr. J.C. Weliamuna is presently involved in a number of cases which deal with infringements upon fundamental rights and public interest litigation. Of particular interest are pending cases which involve government officials and member of the police force. Furthermore, last week Mr. Weliamuna made submissions to the Supreme Court, stating that a fellow lawyer had been subjected to death threats for fulfilling his professional duties.

The attack on Mr. Weliamuna is thus suggestive of a dangerous trend of intimidation and interference in the country’s legal processes. The NPC views this attack as an attempt to harm and intimidate a lawyer and civil society activist and to possibly send a warning to all advocates of human rights, good governance, accountability and integrity in public life. This act of violent intimidation can be interpreted as a thinly veiled attempt to silence critical and dissenting voices in the country.

We join the Free Media Movement (FMM), civil society activists and the Bar Association of Sri Lanka’s (BASL) in condemning this attack as an act which threatens not only us all but the very democratic values upon which our respective professions and institutions are founded.
About NPC: The National Peace Council is an independent and non partisan organisation that works towards a negotiated political solution to the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka. It has a vision of a peaceful and prosperous Sri Lanka in which the freedom, human rights and democratic rights of all the communities are respected. The policy of the National Peace Council is determined by its Governing Council of 20 members who are drawn from diverse walks of life and belong to all the main ethnic and religious communities in the country.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Palestine State: Will Ms Livni help create it?



by Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal

(September 29, New Delhi, Sri Lanka Guardian) Obviously, not many would believe she will or gather courage to do so. That is the political philosophy of Jewish leaders right form the day they established a Jewish State Israel in1947 by annexing the Palestinian lands with the support of UK, UN, USA and other agencies. And that is how the leadership is groomed by the elders in Israel with an “only Israel” bent to suit the national terror agenda of Israel, resulting in endless annexations and settlements in Palestine and continuous genocide by the Jews with an overt and shameless US backing. Strangely enough, there is a strong perception that even some Arabs themselves are opposing the creation of Palestine for cause, though that argument sounds funny.

Israel occupies and controls Palestinians, their lands, resources, economy, taxes and roads and people’s movements. Israeli arrogance, as a hallmark of its democracy plank, is revealed in its continuous settlement projects on Palestinian soil. While Israel behaves rogues, it calls the innocent Palestinians the “terrorists”. USA never cares to attack Israel for its aggression, as it did when Iraq invaded Kuwait. Even as it claimed sincerity in resolving the Mideast crisis, In August, Israel approved construction of 400 new homes in a Jewish neighborhood in annexed east Jerusalem and invited bids for construction of another 416 settler homes in the occupied West Bank. The construction of settlements - viewed as a major obstacle to reaching a peace deal - has nearly doubled since 2007, despite Israel’s pledge to freeze such activities, the Israeli watchdog Peace Now said last month.

Israel now is more worried about Iran than its illegal settlements in Palestine. Going by what the Israeli officials say Israel is panicked by Iranian “threat” and absence of fresh sanctions as part of economic terrorism unleashed on Tehran. If not a usual Israeli bluff, the new radar, which could cut the response time of Israel's Arrow system, designed to intercept incoming missiles was flown into Israel last week along with some 120 American crewmen and has been set up at the Nevatim air base in the Negev desert. The system can pick up a ballistic missile shortly after launch. But that does not make Israel secure if it continues to occupy Arab lands, kill the Palestinians, block the routs from Palestine to outside world.

Now Israel is awaiting a new government, the Palestinians are seriously divided, and President Bush is looking for an agreement, if not a Palestine state, by the end of the year, although both Palestinians and Israelis have expressed doubt, for separate reasons, about achieving that goal. Having last week replaced Ehud Olmert as leader of Kadima, the largest party in the Israeli Knesset, Tzipi Livni has, as anticipated, accepted an invitation from the president Shimon Peres to form a new government. The request followed the resignation on Sept 21 of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who faces several corruption inquiries. He denies any wrongdoing, but police have recommended he be indicted over two of the inquiries - allegations that he misused cash payments from a US businessman, and accusations that he double-billed government agencies for trips abroad.

Continued Israeli settlement construction and Israeli security concerns have clouded Middle East peace negotiations. Both Palestinians and Israelis have expressed doubt about achieving an accord before Bush leaves office. As late as last month Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice held out hope of talks succeeding. "God willing, with the goodwill of the parties, and the tireless work of the parties, we have a good chance of succeeding," Rice said after seeing Israeli and Palestinian leaders and summoning top negotiators for a joint status report.

Past moves

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's achievements in office - listed as direct talks the Palestinians, indirect negotiations with Syria and a steady economy despite global financial turmoil. A US-Israeli strategy coerced the PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas to dismiss the elected Hamas government and to seize control of the Gaza Strip, leaving West bank of the Fatah control; Engineered by Israel, a war broke out in 2006 in south Lebanon - from where Israel had also since partially withdrawn.

The Kadima party was formed nearly three years ago by the then Prime Minister and leader of centre-right Likud party, Ariel Sharon. He brought left-of-centre figures together with Likud members willing to split off in support of his policy of withdrawing settlers from the Gaza Strip and parts of the West Bank. There are many who followed Sharon from Likud, because the Likud alternative, Binyamin Netanyahu, is a "fake" with dubious morals. Olmert’s ratings have plummeted amid the corruption investigations which forced him to announce plans to step down.
Kadima represents a "new political paradigm" and has successfully carved out a centrist niche. Coalition needs 61 for majority. Current coalition (67 seats): Kadima: 29; Labour: 19; Shas: 12; Pensioners party: 7. Other parties: Likud: 12; Yisrael Beitenu: 11; National Union-National Religious Party: 9; United Torah Judaism: 6; Meretz: 5; Arab parties: 10. Livni met Defence Minister Ehud Barak, who is head of Labour Party, the second largest parliamentary bloc, to negotiate a possible partnership. Several right-of-centre parties have called for early elections, arguing that any coalition formed by Ms Livni would not offer stable government.

Tzipora Malka Livni, 50, who has won the vote to become leader of Israel's ruling Kadima party, was born (1958)and raised in Tel Aviv, and has been described as sporty, intelligent and a tomboy during her school days. Tzipi has come from relative political obscurity to within sight of the prime ministership within just 10 years. Born, Ms Livni, a lawyer and mother of two, has moved from a strongly Zionist nationalist background to become a passionate advocate of a land-for-peace deal with the Palestinians. (1983: She Resigned from Mossad to marry and study law 1999: Elected as MP for Likud party; 2005: Joined newly formed Kadima party) She replaces party chief Ehud Olmert, who resigned over allegations or corruption and bribery. As anticipated, on the heels of Olmert's formal resignation as prime minister, Ms Livni has been asked to form a new coalition government.

If Ms Livni, a former Mossad spy, is successful in building an administration, she should be able to govern until elections in 2010. Some say she's honest, but she is widely criticized for her lack of experience in security and politics. Opinion polls suggest that Likud would benefit from an early poll. Hence the new premier would strive hard to seek “adjustments” with coalition partners, including on Palestine issue. But she said that if she failed to do so, she would call an early election. And it is the battle for the centre ground that will loom large as the new leader tries to form a coalition, and takes the party to early general elections if he or she fails. If she fails, a fresh general election will probably be called for the start of next year. But there are many, including key figures within Kadima, who believe Ms Livni is the party's only hope for survival. Kadima might get more seats with Livni. Kadima means 'forward', but Olmert feels the party is going backwards. Olmert is the caretaker prime minister while Ms Livni, 50, tries to form the new government. Ms Livni now has 42 days to form a coalition and has quickly urged Likud party leader Binyamin Netanyahu to join a national unity cabinet - a call the Likud leader has rejected before. Livni needs to build a coalition representing 61 seats in the 120-seat parliament.

Sharon's prot: Challenges for Livni

Soon Israel’s Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni will assume power in Israel as its new premier. The main task before her is obviously establishment or otherwise of Palestine. President Shimon Peres has been holding consultations with a number of parties, inviting opinions on who the leaders wanted to see as prime minister or whether they were seeking early elections. A former spy and foreign minister in charge of the issue for quire some now, Tvini would deliver the Israeli and Palestinian peoples to safety by settling the long pending Palestine establishment issue. But she should do it diplomatically but also take care the US-Israeli strategists might not harm her also, like they did to Ariel Sharon, bedridden in coma, possible as a punishment for “forgetting the expansionism cause of Jews.

Ms Livni has generally kept a low media profile, leading some to consider her somewhat cold and aloof. She has tried to keep her family out of the limelight, but is married to Naftali Spitzer, who owns an advertising agency. She completed her military service, and went on to complete a four-year stint in the intelligence agency Mossad in her early 20s.Little is known about her espionage assignments, except that some of her work involved living in Paris. She later practiced as a lawyer for a decade before entering politics.

Ms Livni's relatively short parliamentary career began when she was elected to the Knesset in 1999 for the right-wing Likud party. She was a prot of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who in 2001 named her minister for regional development.

Other ministerial portfolios followed - immigrant absorption, housing and construction, justice and later foreign affairs. She became a close adviser to Sharon and in 2005 helped to broker his controversial pull-out of Israeli troops and settlers from the Gaza Strip. When he left the Likud party, which was split over the disengagement issue, to set up the Kadima party in the autumn of 2005, Ms Livni went with him.

Right-wing background has molded her political understanding. Becoming a proponent of unilateral disengagement and the formation of a Palestinian state was a major ideological transition for Ms Livni. Her Polish-born father Eitan was a key figure in the Jewish underground movement, the Irgun. It fought British rule in Palestine before Israel was founded in 1948, and is best known for its attack on the King David Hotel in 1946, in which 91 people died. But while she was raised on the dream of a "greater Israel" in a land including the entire West Bank, she came to believe co-existence with the Palestinians was necessary for Israel to survive as a democratic state.

Ms Livni remained foreign minister under Sharon's successor, Olmert, throughout the Israel-Lebanon war in 2006. There have been suggestions she was largely frozen out of military-political decision-making during the war, although she was very involved in negotiating UN resolution 1701 which ended the 34-day conflict. Olmert was heavily criticized for the handling of the war, which was later condemned as an indecisive, badly managed campaign, carried out by ill-prepared forces. Since November 2007, she has been deeply involved in talks with the Palestinian Authority aimed at a deal for a Palestinian state by January 2009. She was foreign minister during the testing times of the 2006 Lebanon war In 2006, she told the New York Times: "I believe, like my parents, in the right of the Jewish people to the entire land of Israel. But I was also raised to preserve Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people and to preserve democratic values.

But because of the terms of the talks, she is unable to reveal her current position on final status issues, such as borders and the fate of Jerusalem. She is, however, seen as being strongly opposed to an agreement that gives any ground on the right of Palestinian refugees to return to Israel. Ms Livni was opposed to the 1993 Oslo accords partly because they left the most contentious issues unresolved. And she is still said to be opposed to a suggested "shelf agreement" amid pressure for an interim document to be signed before US President George W Bush and Olmert leave office. She has to unify her coalition first.

Quartet Sabotage on Palestine?

The Annapolis process launched by the US in November 2007 was meant to herald a new dawn for the Middle East peace process, but conditions for Palestinians, which it was meant to improve, have worsened since peace talks recommenced under US sponsorship in 2007. The Bush administration wanted the November 2007 peace summit at Annapolis to lead to a peace deal between Israelis and Palestinians before it left office but this is looking increasingly unlikely with both USA and Israel playing dirty games.

The key international players trying to promote peace in the Middle East meet on the sidelines of the U.N. General Assembly on Friday as the U.N. Security Council opens a high-level debate on Israeli settlements. The so-called Quartet ? U.N, the USA, the EUnion and Russia ? is meeting at a difficult period in the region. Quartet members attended an Iftar with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and Arab partners on Friday night. Ban also met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Sept 25 evening.

The Middle East diplomatic quartet, makes special efforts to support Israel and condemned "acts of terrorism” against Israelis; it has pressed Israel and the Palestinians to seal a peace deal this year and expressed "deep concern" over continuing settlement expansion by the Jewish state in the West Bank. A ministerial session of quartet ended with a call on the parties "to make every effort to conclude an agreement before the end of 2008."

A report was issued ahead of a Quartet meeting in New York on 26 Sept said the Quartet of international powers has "lost its grip" on the Middle East peace process which it is meant to foster. In a damning report, the agencies say the Quartet - Russia, the US, the EU and the UN - is failing in its mission. "Nearly one year on, we are seeing exponential settlement growth, additional check-points and - because of this - further economic stagnation”. A coalition of 21 aid agencies - including Oxfam, Save the Children, Care, Cafod and World Vision - warned that the peace process would fall apart unless the Quartet made swift and dramatic progress towards its goals.

The Quartet has fundamentally failed to improve the humanitarian situation on the ground. There has been no change in a number of the 10 main objectives set by the Quartet to help improve the daily lives of the Palestinians and in five of them an actual deterioration. Unless the Quartet's words are matched by more sustained pressure and decisive action the situation will deteriorate still further. The Quartet has totally failed to hold Israel to account for expanding the settlements on occupied land. Time is fast running out. There has been no immediate response from the Quartet, whose representative in the region is former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. Unless there is a swift and dramatic improvement, it will be necessary to question what the future is for the Middle East Quartet.

On 26 Sept, the U.N. Security Council held an open debate at the ministerial level on the ongoing Israeli settlement building in disputed territory. Saudi Arabia requested the debate to coincide with the General Assembly, which has brought a host of world leaders to New York. At a Security Council debate specially convened on the issue formally called for by Saudi Arabia, Arab countries on 26 Sept Friday slammed Israel over its settlement expansion policy. "Settlement makes the creation of a viable Palestinian state impossible," Saudi foreign minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said during the council debate.

In a cleaver move, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice shifted the focus from the settlement issue to appease her Jewish friends who throng around White House, and instead urged Arab countries to "consider ways they might reach out to Israel. She added that the Arab world needed to fully understand that “Israel belongs to the Middle East and will remain" in the Middle East, but US wants to make it the dominant terror state in the region. “Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas told the council that the Israeli settlement blocs "will not allow for the emergence of a viable Palestinian state because they divide the West Bank into at least four cantons." "How can I convince my people of the necessity of peace with Israel when settlement construction continues?" he added. French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner, whose country currently chairs the European Union, meanwhile restated the EU view that Israeli settlements, "wherever in the occupied Palestinian territories, are illegal under international law." Israeli President Shimon Peres told the General Assembly in his address on Sept 24 that despite "stagnation and regression and failure" in the peace process, "Israelis and Arabs are marching toward peace." One does know if he could also joke.

An Observation

US-Israel strategists have split Palestine into two regions, Gaza and West Bank. Ban is hoping to push Israeli-Palestinian negotiations and Palestinian reconciliation between Fatah, which controls the West Bank, and the elected Hamas, which is left with Gaza. Also, top EU officials met with Ryad Al Malki, the Palestinian minister of foreign affairs on Sept 25, in an attempt to take a greater role moving the peace talks forward. EU said in a statement said:" This meeting, which took place at crucial time in the peace process, and on the eve of the meeting of the Quartet, provided an opportunity to discuss the European Union's enhanced role in the peace process deepening relations between the European Union and the Palestinian Authority".

Israel and the (Fatah) Palestinians revived negotiations toward resolving core problems like the status of Jerusalem, the borders of a future Palestinian state and refugees. But US-Israel combines still keep Hamas away and without involving them Mideast peace cannot be achieved they know. But the parties set the goal of a peace deal by the end of 2008, but that target is looking increasingly difficult to meet since the Israel is insincere in its words and deeds.

At one point Israel announced withdrawal of forces and settlements form Palestine. But the unifying banner of "unilateral disengagement" now droops at half mast. A near-fatal stroke has left Sharon in a coma, but it could not be ascertained if that had indeed been a natural development or some ploy to make his voice silent on Palestine. Or, was it US-Israeli game plan to thwart any Palestine move? Many hope Ms Livni would breathe new life into a political establishment mired in sleaze and dominated by ageing, male, former military figures, although she is widely criticized for her lack of experience. Will any new era with blessings begin now?

The task facing Tzipi Livni, however, is not an easy one. In her nearly two years as Israel's second ever female foreign minister, she has led the team under Prime Minister Ehud Olmert negotiating with the Palestinian Authority. She remains highly popular with the Israeli public, seen by many as an "Ms Clean" - a fresh alternative to a political establishment dominated by ageing, military males, many of whom have been tainted by corruption. She could use her popularity to settle the Palestine issue and set in motion a new peace wave in the region.

It is funny, under the protection of the USA, Israel insists that Israeli settlements in Palestine "are not an obstacle to peace." The only path to Israel’s security is peace and it is time for Israel to understand that it cannot continue to exempt itself from behaving in accordance to international law. It is, first and foremost, about Israeli commitment to prepare their people, who are fed on lies about Arabs and Palestinians, for the price of peace, to accept the true meaning of peace. This will avert any leadership crisis whenever a deal for peace is struck. Hopefully, the new premier in Tel Aviv Tzipi Livni would prove to be a real statesman as well!

Dr. Abdul Ruff Colachal Research Scholar, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi can be reached at abdulruff_jnu@yahoo.com
- Sri Lanka Guardian

The plight of the thousands of internally displaced people



A Statement from Catholic Bishops’ Conference In Sri Lanka is follows;

(September 29, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) At the plenary meeting of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Sri Lanka (CBCSL) held on 22 September 2008 the Bishops shared their concerns about the plight of the thousands of internally displaced people as a result of the ongoing war in the districts of Mulaitivu and Kilinochchi.

We appreciate the efforts taken by the government to ensure that food and other essentials reach the internally displaced However, we also understand that sufficient stocks of food do not reach the people due to certain hindrances, Thousands of people are living under trees and open spaces without shelter anti access to water and sanitation difficulties in transporting essential commodities have resulted in fuel, food medicine, shelter materials etc being in short supply Education of the children has been disrupted It was noted that as a result of aerial bombing several innocent civilians have been killed. The trauma that the people, particularly the children, undergo is noted to be unprecedented.

Therefore, we earnestly urge the government and the LTTE that utmost care be taken to protect the lives of innocent civilians. It was noted that the LTTE is not permitting the civilians to come out of Mulakivu and Kilinochchi. This is a very unfortunate situation. We ask the LTFE not to hinder the innocent civilians from proceeding to safe areas as the war is escalating and the lives of these innocent people are greatly endangered The innocent civilians must not be used as human shields,

We strongly urge that every effort be made by the government to be conscious of this situation and meet the humanitarian needs and take meaningful steps to take the people out of this trapped situation. We also recommend that some alternate measures such as zones of peace be taken to ensure the safety of the innocent in the districts of Mulaktivu and Kilinochchi.

We plead that humanitarian laws be respected by everyone, and that institutions such as schools, hospitals and places of worship be carefully avoided in the combat
We wish to reiterate the position that we have always upheld that lasting peace can be realized only through a negotiated political solution which recognizes human dignity and equality ensuring the legitimate rights and aspirations of all citizens.

BishopVianne Fernando President
Bishop Norbert M. Andradi OMi
Secretary General
Catholic Bishops’ Conference Catholic Bishops’ Conference
.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

LTTE deploys more reserves to save Kilinochchi



(September 29, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The Army had closed in on the Mankulam-Iranamadu road (A-9) by last evening. In some areas, the former gap of 1km to the A-9 has been reduced to 300m due to ongoing operations. Fighting is ongoing in Kokavil area where LTTE units are being gradually encircled by troops.

Commanders have taken steps to maintain safe passage for civilians along the A-9. The 58 Division has also been gradually eating away at LTTE resistance along the Nachchikuda-Akkarayan road. The current lull in the battlefield is due to extra precautions to ensure safe passage for civilians.

Kilinochchi Town has now been emptied of civilians and only LTTE units move in and around the area, LRRP and intelligence units have confirmed. But all-out war for Kilinochchi could make the A-9 dangerously unsafe for civilians who are willing to escape.

Civilians have been moved to other civilian houses, schools and other buildings at Vishwamadu and Puthukudiirippu areas by the LTTE. 38 of these captives escaped via sea and reached Weli Oya recently but the large majority are yet to escape LTTE clutches.
While a cat and mouse game goes on with regard to civilians, LTTE units have been gradually recalled from Muhamalai and Nagarkovil lines into Kilinochchi for what intelligence sources believe could be the final push they have been awaiting. 150 more cadres had reached Kilinochchi last week.

Evidence of cadre movements were uncovered by ground troops on Friday morning when Army units conducting limited operations at the Muhamalai FDL discovered that some of the LTTE lines have been emptied of its cadres. Although it is usually the LTTE's practice to abandon the lines during daytime, it is unusual to empty them at night and in the morning. This trend is observed even at Nagarkovil.

Military commanders have continued with the small group operations in these areas despite the observation as large group operations have been vulnerable to indirect attacks several times before.

Meanwhile LTTE's insurgent operations in the east are still continuing primarily in STF controlled areas. STF was withdrawn from Batticaloa town following several attacks against the Security Forces by LTTE infiltrators. The Army filled in the void and sent in two Military Intelligence teams headed by two officers from Trincomalee. All infiltrators were systematically identified and gunned down. However unless similar steps are taken in STF controlled areas, insurgents may launch sporadic attacks. Possibility of large attacks can be largely overruled at this time. [DefenceWire Report]
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Another Bomb Blast in Colombo (Updated)


(September 29, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) An explosion has been reported in the Malwatta street, Pettah, a shortwhile ago, Police said. The explosion has taken place close to the harbour near the Khan clock town.
At least five vehicles have been damaged, however no casualties were reported immediately.
The bomb is believed to have been set in a vehicle.
Update: “One lady wounded in an explosion has admitted the General hospital”, Mr. Hector Weerasinghe , Director of the General Hospital said - Sri Lanka Guardian

Sri Lanka seeks early return of democracy in Fiji


(September 29, New York, Sri Lanka Guardian) Minister of Foreign Affairs, Rohitha Bogollagama emphasized the need for a time bound approach to facilitate Fiji’s return to democratic rule, while addressing the 30th meeting of the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) held in New York last Saturday (27 September 2008). The Minister referred to the Commonwealth stipulated deadline of March 2009 for elections to be held in order that a democratically elected government could be established. He further observed that in the event this condition was not fulfilled, the Commonwealth would have to consider further action after taking ground realities into account and apply the Millbrook Plan of Action.

The Minister pointed out that while the initiative of a “President’s Forum” to facilitate political dialogue for electoral reforms was a positive initiative, the envisaged role had been stymied due to a number of disagreements among the stakeholders. He said that the issues are not insurmountable, but needed the sincere political will to this end.

Minister Bogollagama said that the role being performed by the Pacific Island Forum is important in bringing about a democratic solution to the question of governance in Fiji. He stated that Sri Lanka supports the continued regional and international efforts to achieve legitimate constitutional rule in Fiji and requested the Commonwealth Secretary General to continue his engagement in this endeavour. The CMAG decided to meet in early 2009 to review the progress and consider further measures if necessary, consistent with the Millbrook Plan of Action.

Foreign Minister Bogollagama also met with the British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, David Miliband on the sidelines of the CMAG meeting. He outlined the action taken by the Sri Lanka Government in re-establishing democratic rule in the Eastern Province after having cleared the LTTE from that area through targeted military engagement. He referred to the conduct of the Local Government and Provincial Council elections in the East resulting in the election of a Chief Minister, a former child soldier, initially of the LTTE and now representing the political faction of its renegade group the TMVP. The Minister recalled the meeting between Lord Mark Malloch Brown, Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and the Chief Minister of the Eastern Province during his recent visit to Sri Lanka. He explained that the strategy which was followed in the Eastern Province is being replicated in the North and that military engagement was necessary to eradicate terrorism from that region, in order to create the necessary ground conditions for the establishment of democratic institutions.

The Minister also took the opportunity to refer to Sri Lanka’s application for the extension of the EU GSP + facility. He pointed out that having successfully overcome the challenge of terrorism and re-established democracy in the Eastern Province, the empowerment of the people is a major priority for the Government. Therefore, obstacles which hinder Sri Lanka’s market access to the EU would only serve to hurt the people. In this context, he hoped that the EU would consider this aspect when examining Sri Lanka’s application for the extension of the EU GSP + facility.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

Sri Lanka on course to achieve MDGs by 2015



(September 29, New York, Sri Lanka Guardian) Participating on behalf of President Mahinda Rajapaksa in the interactive Round Table discussions segment of the high level meeting on the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) held on the fringes of the UN General Assembly sessions in New York last Saturday (27 September 2008), Minister of Foreign Affairs, Rohitha Bogollagama said that Sri Lanka is on track to achieve the MDGs by 2015, which has been facilitated by re-structuring the country’s socio-economic fundamentals, in keeping with the aspirations of the people.

Speaking further, he emphasized that sustainable development should be viewed in the context of the people, as governments represent the people, and therefore, imposition of economic sanctions ought to be avoided as it is only the citizens of that country who would suffer the adverse consequences. The Minister, while associating himself with the sentiments that were expressed by the President of East Timor, who spoke earlier, urged the removal of sanctions on Cuba as a vital step for the betterment of its people. He stated that it is imperative to seek people-centric development to ensure that the people are the real beneficiaries of development programmes.

Referring to the economic pursuits of the Sri Lanka Government, Minister Bogollagama pointed out that free education had resulted in a 94% literacy rate and similarly, free health services have resulted in an average life expectancy of 74 years. Further, he referred to the fact that there are no major diseases in Sri Lanka and that malaria as an epidemic has been eradicated.

The Foreign Minister pointed out that 70% of Sri Lanka’s population is living in the rural areas and the Government is pursuing concerted action to empower the people, especially in areas affected by terrorism. In this context, he referred to the Government’s policy to eliminate terrorism in all its forms, as had been done in the East, with a view to empowering those people from that region, mainly through agricultural pursuits. This he said, would contribute towards greater food production, and thereby, leading to food security. Minister Bogollagama shared the position articulated by India of ensuring a pivotal role for the FAO on food security.

Subsequently on the same day (27 September 2008), making an intervention at the meeting of G11 Foreign Ministers in New York, Foreign Minister Bogollagama called for Lower Middle Income countries such as Sri Lanka to work closely with other countries in this grouping, to address developmental challenges and vulnerability to external turbulence in the global markets. He observed that such action was imperative as this segment of countries is increasingly being marginalized on global platforms.

The Minister informed the Group that the Cabinet of Ministers in Sri Lanka had approved Sri Lanka becoming a signatory to the G11 Framework Agreement on Economic, Trade and Cultural Cooperation. He also welcomed the decision to hold a G11 Business Forum on the sidelines of the G11 Summit in May 2009. He envisaged that this Forum would be able to bring together, representatives of the private sector in the G11 countries to promote connectivity through the exchange of business delegations.


Minister Bogollagama also commended the Jordanian King’s initiative in establishing contacts with the G8. He emphasized that this dialogue should be focused on specific issues such as food security, transfer of technology, alternative sources of energy and other areas of primary interest to G11 members. He also proposed that this interaction between the G11 and the G8 be held annually. As the G11 is still in its formative stages, it was agreed that members should work closely to forge links that would be mutually beneficial at an economic level. The G11 agreed to re-convene in May 2009 at the Dead Sea in Jordan.
- Sri Lanka Guardian

TERRIFYING SAMENESS: AN OPEN LETTER TO VINOD MEHTA




"The discourse on our 24-hour news channels is even more predictable. The usual suspects are rounded up to provide insight and corrective action. Experts like B. Raman, Ajit Doval and Julio Ribeiro, alas, provide no cure. Police reform always gets roped into the discussion and we are reminded of Supreme Court orders which have been studiously ignored. There is an element of farce in the whole exercise. When the next terrorist outrage happens, as it will, we will go over the rigmarole once more. I don’t have any solutions to a very complex problem but I do know that the present strategy is a total failure. Let me correct that because I believe no one in the country understands or is aware that a strategy exists—except to condemn terrorism and terrorists. As the Indian Mujahideen in their e-mail boasted: they can strike anywhere, anytime."

Extract from the "Delhi Diary" of Shri Vinod Mehta, Editor, "Outlook"

Dear Shri Vinod Mehta,

(September 28, Chennai, Sri Lanka Guardian) I read with interest your above-quoted observations in the issue of "Outlook" dated October 6,2008. A major problem one faces in India in promoting an adequate understanding of the problem of terrorism is that most of us have little time or patience for facts and figures and for details. We have our idees fixes and come to conclusions, which are often superficial, on the basis of such idees fixes. That is one of the reasons for the image of helplessness in dealing with terrorism which we project of ourselves to our own people and to the rest of the world.

Our record in dealing with terrorism and insurgency is not as negative as it is often projected to be. We have had a successful record in Punjab, Nagaland (partial), Mizoram, Tripura and in Tamil Nadu in dealing with terrorism of Al Umma. Even in Jammu & Kashmir, the ground situation was showing signs of definite improvement till the recent avoidable controversy over facilities for the Amarnath pilgrims.

There are two kinds of terrorism/insurgency where our record has been poor till now---- the jihadi kind, which is essentially an urban phenomenon outside J&K, and the Maoist (Naxalite) kind, which is essentially a rural phenomenon. If one compares these two kinds of terrorism with the instances where we were not without success, one would find a striking difference. We have succeeded where the terrorism or insurgency was a regional phenomenon and was confined to a narrow area. We have not succeeded where the threat was pan-Indian in nature with the network extending its presence to many States in the North and the South.

A pan-Indian threat requires a co-ordinated pan-Indian response at the political and professional levels. Unfortunastely, we do not have it. The multiplicity of political parties, the era of coalition and the tendency in our country to over-politicise the problem of terrorism come in the way of a pan-Indian political response. The tendency of the intelligence agencies and the police of different States to keep each other in the dark about what they know and not to admit to each other as to what they do not know come in the way of a pan-Indian professional response.

There has been a plethora of reports and recommendations on the need for better sharing and co-ordination, but without any effect on our agencies and the police. I was talking to a recently-retired Police chief on the present state of co-ordination and sharing. He admitted that there has been no noticeable improvement. He added:" The agencies and the police show a greater readiness to share their information with Praveen Swami, the journalist of "The Hindu", than with each other. We all wait for his columns in "The Hindu" to know what information other agencies and the police of other States have."

The agencies and the Police are largely responsible for the absence of a co-ordinated professional response, but the political leadership at the Centre and in different States cannot escape their share of responsibility.A determined political leader, who has the national interests in mind, can use a whip and make the agencies and the police co-operate. We saw it in the case of Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi and Narasimha Rao at the Centre and Beant Singh,former Chief Minister, in the case of Punjab, and Sharad Pawar in the case of Maharashtra. A political leader whose policies and actions are motivated by partisan and not national interests will come in the way of professional co-operation. We saw it in the case of Mulayam Singh Yadav and Mayawati in Uttar Pradesh.

Any cure to the problem of jihadi and Maoist terrorism has to start at the political level. A political leader has to play a dual role. He has to help the professionals in taking firm action against the terrorists---whatever be their community and ideology.He has to give them whatever tools they need. At the same time, he has to identify the circumstances and perceptions which drive young Muslims to take to jihadi terrorism and young tribals to take to Maoist terrorism. Anger is one of the common root causes of all terrorism. Unless this anger is addressed, professional handling of the threat alone, however effective, cannot bring about an enduring end to this threat.

An effective political handling has to start with a detailed analysis of the causes of anger and action to deal with them. Our young Muslims, who are taking to jihadi terrorism, are not bothered by issues such as lack of education and unemployment, reservation for Muslims etc . They are angry at what they consider to be the unfairness to the Muslims, which, according to them, is widely prevalent in India. They are angry with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for destroying the Babri Masjid and with the Congress (I) for not preventing it. They are angry with both for not implementing the Sri Krishna Commission report on alleged excesses commited by the Mumbai Police in dealing with the riots by some Muslims after the Babri Masjid demolition. They are angry with the BJP for what happened in Gujarat in 2002. They are angry with both the BJP and the Congress (I) for their studied silence on the alleged violations of the human rights of their co-religionists in Afghanistan and Iraq. They are angry with our political class----particularly the BJP and the Congress (I)--- for not uttering one word of criticism about the special detention centres for Muslim suspects set up by the US in Guantanamo Bay in Cuba and in Bagram in Afghanistan. Even Tony Blair, who was widely perceived as an American poodle, criticised the Guantanamo Bay detention centre through a statement by his Attorney-General in 2006 before he left office, but none of our leaders has uttered a word on this subject. Manmohan Singh claims himself to be secular at home, but he profusely praises President George Bush, who is strongly disliked by large sections of the Muslims of the world. His unfortunate statement that the people of India like Bush is not shared by the 160 million Muslims of India and many others.

Unsatisfactory political handling of the Muslim youth by all political parties is an aggravating cause of the threat from jihadi terrorism. The political class is not prepared to mend its ways and play its role in dealing with this problem. How can they expect the professional class to produce a miracle cure?

Similarly, it is the absence of meaningful land reforms and perceptions of suppression of the tribals by the so-called upper caste Hindus , which is an important cause of the tribal anger in Central India. It is the responsibility of the political class and the society as a whole to address this. They do not do so and keep nursing an illusion that more and more money, men and equipment for the agencies and the police will end this problem. It won't.

The way we kick around the problem of terrorism like a football blaming everybodyelse except ourselves can be seen in the TV debates and media columns. The same arguments are repeated without worrying over their validity. The Congress (I) and the analysts supporting it ridicule the BJPs demand for the revival of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) by pointing out that despite the introduction of the POTA by the BJP-led Government, major acts of terrorism took place during its tenure. The BJP attributes the increase in jihadi terrorism since the present Government assumed office in 2004 to its abolition of the POTA.

Both the arguments are partly correct and partly wrong. Yes, it is correct that despite the POTA major terrorist strikes took place during the BJP regime. So too, in Western countries, despite special powers given to the agencies and the police major incidents of terrorism took place. The Madrid blasts of March,2004, the London blasts of July,2005, and the Glasgow incident of June 2007, took place after special powers were given. Nobody in the West uses these incidents as an argument against special powers.

Similarly, an increase in attacks on soft targets has been faced by many countries of the world after the Bali explosion of October,2002. So too India. This is due to the tightening of physical security for hard targets after 9/11. The new focus of the jihadi terrorists on soft targets has meant more terrorist strikes and more casualties. The undoubted fact that casualties due to jihadi terrorism have more than doubled since the Manmohan Singh Government came to power cannot be solely attributed to its abolition of the POTA.

Effective intelligence and physical security and a modern legal architecture are the three essential components of any counter-terrorism strategy.Intelligence and physical security help in preventing acts of terrorism. Successful investigation and prosecution deter the flow of new recruits to terrorist organisations.If only we had a federal agency solely for the investigation and prosecution of terrorism cases, we will not be facing the kind of messy situation we are facing today---- with the Gujarat police under a BJP Government giving one version of the so-called Indian Mujahideen (IM) and the Police in Congress (I) ruled Delhi and Maharashtra giving a different version.

Flow of human intelligence about jihadi terrorism is weak because of the post-9/11 phenomenon of global Islamic solidarity and the adversarial relationship between the agencies and the police on the one side and the Muslim community on the other.Feelings of Islamic solidarity prevent even law-abiding Muslims from volunteering to the agencies and the police information about their co-religionists, who have taken to terrorism and from assisting the police in their investigation. The adversarial relationship has resulted in mutual demonisation. How to come out of this syndrome is a matter for serious consideration not only by the police and the agencies, but also by the political class and the civil society, including the media.

Once we allow terrorism and insurgencies of different kinds to make their appearance in our society it takes a long time to deal with them. We took 19 years to deal with the Naga insurgency, another 19 years to deal with the Mizo insurgency, 14 years to deal with Khalistani terrorism and about 10 years to deal with Al Umma. The French took 19 years to deal with the terrorism of Carlos and his group. Even after 41 years of vigorous implementation of a no-holds-barred counter-terrorism strategy, Israel is still grappling with the terrorism of the Palestinians and the Hezbollah. The British took over 20 years to bring the Irish Republican Army under control.

The jihadi terrorism in the Indian territory outside J&K is a post-Babri Masjid demolition phenomenon. This has been rendered more difficult to handle by the post-9/11 emergence of the concept of a global jihad. Our jihadi terrorism is still only a pan-Indian phenomenon, but it has not yet become a part of the global jihadi phenomenon. Preventing it from happening is the responsibility of the political leadership and containing and rooting it out is the responsibility of the professional class. The two have to work together, with understanding and support from the civil society. The attitude of our political class to terrorism is ambivalent. On the one hand, it is worried---rightly---over this growing threat. On the other, it continues to view this as a vote-catcher. Every political party has been firm in demanding action against terrorism when it is out of power. It becomes soft when it comes to power. That is the bane of our counter-terrorism. Only voter pressure can force the political class to stop exploiting terrorism as an electoral weapon and to start dealing with it as a major threat to national security, which should unite the political class and the civil society.

(The writer, B. Raman, is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com )
- Sri Lanka Guardian