What is needed to be an ‘Activist’?’

“What is important to know is how to interpret any event as a gross violation of human rights or suppression of free media by the government of Sri Lanka. Ability to manipulate the situation to tarnish the image of the country and its people to impress the rest of the world that Sri Lanka is an ethnic majoritarian and communal and a full-blown terror state while the LTTE as a harmless liberation movement, is essential.”
____________

By S. Akurugoda

(September 29, Melbourne, Sri Lanka Guardian) Both printed and electronic media are full of news items carrying the activities, statements and articles of so-called ‘activists’, especially those who pretend to be the guardian of human rights, free media rights and peace. Apart from the lucrative jobs, these millionaire ‘activists’ are receiving free attractive titles, wide publicity, and free foreign trips and so forth, perhaps, not second to any other job in existence.

To be an ‘activist’ today, knowledge in English is essential, because the ‘activist’ needs to communicate with the west, their employer, effectively. Knowledge on any other European language such as German, French etc may be useful since some of the funding agencies are from those countries. Paper qualifications too are useful to some extent. An ‘activist’ with a degree in low irrespective of his/her speciality (not necessarily a practicing lawyer), will get the automatic label ‘human rights lawyer’. Post graduate degree such as doctorate, from any field, from a western country is an added qualification since such a title will facilitate the use of another label ‘expert’.

The worldwide LTTE propaganda machinery and free media counterparts are there to promote the theories and practices of the ‘experts’.

Besides the above requirements, possible link with the National Christian Council and its various organisations operating in and outside the country is a priority. Since the activists are only concerned about the wellbeing of the ‘Tamil militants’, to be successful in his/her livelihood, one has to be a born abhorrence of Sinhala Buddhist.

Despite the fact that the role is not a recognized profession, shamelessness is essential, perhaps, similar to the world’s oldest profession!

Let us go through some of the statements of the ‘activists’ appeared in media prior to the military defeat of LTTE to see what is really needed to know to be an ‘activist’.

About Sri Lanka’s security forces;
"Violent actions are committed by the Sri Lanka’s military. The government and allied forces are responsible for abductions, assassinations and disappearances, rapes, threats to media freedom, human rights violations, genocide of the Tamil people etc."

About the so-called ethnic conflict;
"The conflict must be viewed as a struggle between two nations since Tamils are a distinct community. Tamils have the right to demand a separate State until their aspirations are met- that is to give LTTE control over the North-East region.

About the military strength and vision of LTTE;
“The LTTE is invincible and have demonstrated its capacity with its attack on military bases and destroyed millions of dollars worth of economic assets. LTTE is committed to the nation-building and state-building and its vision of a solution is displaying a commendable degree of political maturity".

About Sinhala-Buddhist;
"Actions are needed to counter politics of militant Sinhalese nationalism, since it is the Sinhala -Buddhist extremist groups who cause trouble and generate violence".

About suicide bombing;
"Regardless of who is responsible, the suicide bombing indicates the growing absence of confidence in the integrity of the government institutions".

The list will go on, but the above is sufficient, for the time being, to understand the nature of the role that has to be played by an ‘activist’. In brief, what is important to know is how to interpret any event as a gross violation of human rights or suppression of free media by the government of Sri Lanka. Ability to manipulate the situation to tarnish the image of the country and its people to impress the rest of the world that Sri Lanka is an ethnic majoritarian and communal and a full-blown terror state while the LTTE as a harmless liberation movement, is essential.

Although the kind of activities carried out by the above ‘activists’ is impossible in US, UK and allied countries (so-called free world), probably, due to tough anti-terrorist legislations, above ‘activists’ in Sri Lanka are free to do any thing at their will in support of terrorism and against their own country. Sri Lanka, after making a record by defeating the most ruthless terrorist group in the world while feeding and providing all their necessities, is yet to make another record by allowing the most malice propaganda machineries to operate within its own territory under the pretext of peace, free media and human rights.
-Sri Lanka Guardian
Pearl Thevanayagam said...

An activist needs to articulate in English and thanks to colonialism English is globally the lingua franca of comunication whether you like it or not.
Activists have an agenda. Either they want to profit or having earned kudos of their own merit want recognition.
Activists claim if they could utilise 40 percent of their fnds towards their activism they would not have toiled in vain. Some 60 percent is their overheads.
Activism read charity is a cottage industry for many.
If we say politicians are profiting from the voters then it is understandable that activists are profiting from the deprived and the downtrodden.

This is why Premadasa set up NGO commissions inquiring into their activities circa 1991.
Alas commissions have no teeth and ergo charities go scot-free.
Commissions only produce reports and it is up to the public to sue charities on findings of the commissions.
Who bells the cat is the question that sparks those who wish to ferret out the truth. While charities carry on merrily charity benefactors rely on scraps thrown out from charity funds.
Why has not the government which is looking into public spending scrutinise charities including churches and other places of worship.
The govt. would save a lot of money from stopping the licences of bogus charities.