J.S. Tisssainayagam sentenced to 20 years and justice is dead in Sri Lanka

"The greatest loser in this case is not J.S. Tisssainayagam it is the justice system and the judiciary in Sri Lanka that has suffered the greatest loss which would be hard for it to overcome. Even this is not a huge surprise for most people in Sri Lanka."
_____________________

A Statement by the Asian Human Rights Commission

(August 31, Kowloon, Hongkong , Sri Lanka Guardian) The Asian Human Rights Commission is saddened, disappointed and shocked but not surprised at the judgment of the High Court of Colombo in sentencing J.S. Tisssainayagam to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment for a simple piece of writing which he had done and which was interpreted as aiding and abetting terrorism. The AHRC is not surprised by this judgment because at the very inception of this case the AHRC pointed out that this is purely a political case, the first of its kind in which the accused, Mr. Tisssainayagam’s guilt or innocence was not an issue but an opportunity to send a message to society on the changed circumstances of the country where freedom of expression does not matter at all. That was the real aim of this case. It is the sort of prosecution that could have happened under the regime of Joseph Stalin through the prosecutor, Andrei Vyshinsky.

In Vyshinsky’s trials the outcome was predetermined. The trials of the 1930s were known worldwide as show trials. Those actually accused were not really the targets of the proceedings. The accused were mere exhibits to be advertised before the rest of Russia in order to pass a message to the people about the fundamental beliefs that Stalin wanted to impose on society. Vyshinsky’s biographer Arkady Vaksberg writes that the “purpose of the trial had not been to disgrace or, indeed, to annihilate some of the accused but to create a precedent and pave the way for a psychological attack on the population.”

Tisssainayagam has been selected for a show trial where there was not even any evidence to base a charge on. The particular passages which were arbitrarily selected from his writings did not represent any attempt to raise feelings of racism or to instigate people to violence on the basis of race. The text was selected as the pretext and there was no genuine thought in this prosecution at all.

What the case points to is the illusions of the liberals both in Sri Lanka and abroad who fail to see a persecution staged as a show trial. The illusion that somehow things may turn out and that there would be a fair trial was the comfort zone in which many people were resting, unwilling to accept that justice is dead in Sri Lanka and that the executive can manipulate and get whatever verdict it wants.

The greatest loser in this case is not J.S. Tisssainayagam it is the justice system and the judiciary in Sri Lanka that has suffered the greatest loss which would be hard for it to overcome. Even this is not a huge surprise for most people in Sri Lanka. They know that justice has been dead for a long time in their country.

The Tisssainayagam case will also remain the most glaring proof of the absence of freedom of expression in Sri Lanka. The memory of this case will shame so many journalists and media men in the country who have found it possible to lick the very feet of the executive which has completely destroyed the freedom of expression in the country. Some have fought back and lost their lives and some finally fled for their own safety. But this has also created a paradise for those who live by their contribution to misinformation and suppression of freedoms.

We urge the local and international community to condemn the judgment and the sentence in Tisssainayagam’s case and to call for his unconditional release. We also urge the local and international community to grasp the reality that justice is dead in Sri Lanka and the freedom of expression and the media which has also been killed.

Justice and media freedom in Sri Lanka is like the phantom limb; a dream of an amputee who still believes that his limbs are intact. The reminder of the Tisssainayagam case should always be associated with the image of the phantom limb.

# # #

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984.

-Sri Lanka Guardian

Journalist Tissainayagama sentenced to 20 years RI

(August 31, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Journalist J.S.Tissainayagam charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act has been sentenced for 20 years RI.The sentence was passed by Colombo High Court judge Deepali Wijesundara.

His lawyers said they were appealing against the judgment.

Journalist J.S.Tissainayagam charged under the Prevention of Terrorism Act has been sentenced for 20 years RI.

The sentence was passed by Colombo High Court judge Deepali Wijesundara.

His lawyers said they were appealing against the judgment.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Hatoyama as Japanese PM: implications for India

( To be read in continuation of my earlier article of August 18,2009, titled "Maritime Security Concerns of Japan & Prospects of India-Japan Co-Operation " )

By B.Raman

(August 31, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Media reports from Japan indicate that as widely forecast by opinion polls, the Democratic Party of Japan ( DPJ) has won the elections to the House of Representatives, the lower House of the Japanese Diet (Parliament), held on August 30,2009,dislodging from power the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)-led coalition, which had ruled the country almost continuously for over 50 years except for 11 months in 1997 when a non-LDP coalition ruled the country. The 62-year-old Yukio Hatoyama, a founding father of the DPJ in 1996 and its President since May,2009, who used to act as the media spokesperson of the non-LDP coalition in 1997, is expected to take over as the new Japanese Prime Minister.

The DPJ, which came into existence in 1996, was expanded on April 27, 1998, by merging into it the Party of Japan, the Good Governance Party, the New Fraternity Party and the Democratic Reform Party. The newly-expanded party had a liberal or social-democratic agenda. In 1998, as a result of these mergers, the newly-expanded DPJ had 93 members in the House of Representatives and 38 in the upper House called the House of Councilors. Naoto Kan, former Health and Welfare Minister, was appointed as the President of the party and Tsutomu Hata, former Prime Minister, as Secretary-General.

On September 24, 2003, the party was further expanded by merging into it the small, centre-right Liberal Party led by Ichir Ozawa, which had eight seats in the House of Councillors, but none in the lower House.

In the 2003 elections to the House of Representatives, the DPJ won 178 seats, increasing its tally by 85 seats, but still short of a majority. Following a pension scandal, Naoto Kan resigned and was replaced as President of the party by Katsuya Okada, a liberal. In the 2004 elections to the House of Councillors, the DPJ won one seat more than the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

In 2005, Junichiro Koizumi, the then Prime Minister, dissolved the House of Representatives before it had completed its tenure following the rejection by it of a Bill moved by his Government for the privatisation of the postal banking services and called for fresh elections. The DPJ did badly in the elections and lost 62 seats to the LDP. Following this electoral set-back, Okada resigned as the President of the Party and was replaced by Seiji Maehara in September 2005. He had to resign on March 31,2006, following allegations that he used a fake E-mail to make allegations of wrong-doing against the Koizumi Government. He was replaced on April 7,2006, by Ichir Ozawa as the party President.

The real credit for building the DPJ, which started as a hotch-potch party of various liberal or social democratic factions, into a viable political formation capable of beating the LDP should go to Ozawa, who started his political career as a member of the LDP in the Diet in 1969 succeeding his father and as a political aide to Kakuei Tanaka, the legendary LDP leader.Dissatisfied with the policies of the LDP leadership, he and some of his followers quit the LDP in 1993. After his resignation from the LDP, he gravitated to the small New Frontier Party and then to the Liberal Party, which subsequently merged with the DPJ.Even before he moved to the DPJ, he had published a document titled a Blueprint for a New Japan, which called for electoral reforms and more assertive foreign-affairs and defense policies. As the President of the DPJ, he worked for gaining public support to some of these ideas incorporated in the Blueprint. He had to resign abruptly as the Party President in May,2009 after his secretary Takanori Okubo was accused of accepting political donations from a company involved in scandals.Ozawa, who had pledged to cleanse Japanese politics of corruption and wrong-doing, was embarrassed when his own secretary was allegedly found involved in political corruption.

But for this, Ozawa would have led the DPJ to victory in the elections and might have become the new Prime Minister. Ultimately, after the resignation of Ozawa, Yukio Hatoyama, who has been in the DPJ right from its inception in 1996, took over as the President of the Party and led it to a spectacular electoral victory, which would make him the Prime Minister.While Ozawa was embarrassed by the scandal involving his secretary, he has not been politically weakened. He still has many supporters and admirers in the Party and is expected to play an important role in policy-formulation either as a member of the Cabinet under Hatoyama or as a senior functionary of the party.

Hatoyama, who belonged to a blue-blooded LDP family, studied engineering at the prestigious University of Tokyo and earned his Ph.D. from the Stanford University of the US. His grand-father was the Prime Minister of Japan from 1954 to 56. His father served as the Foreign Minister of Japan for some years. Hatoyama, who started his career as a teacher, entered politics in 1983 as the personal secretary to his father.

In a personality profile on Hatoyama disseminated on August 27,2009, Mari Yamaguchi of the Associated Press wrote as follows: "Stiff and professor-like, Hatoyama is an unlikely figure to bring about major political change. He is not seen as charismatic and has a tendency to be verbose and dismissive. His shock of curly hair is often piled up on his head as though he just awoke from a troubled sleep. He has even garnered the nickname "alien" because he can come across as eccentric or aloof. During the campaign, Hatoyama appealed to voters with promises that he will cut wasteful government spending, rein in the power of the bureaucracy and put more money in consumers' pockets by holding off on tax hikes that the ruling party has said are in the works.One of his biggest departures from the LDP's positions is Japan's relationship with the United States, its biggest trading partner and military ally. He wants Japan to be more independent from Washington and closer to Asia. "We must not forget our identity as a nation located in Asia," he has said. But Hatoyama has also stressed he does not intend to change Japan's course overnight. In an opinion piece published Thursday in The New York Times, Hatoyama said the U.S.-Japan alliance would "continue to be the cornerstone of Japanese diplomatic policy." Polls indicate that voters want change — but not too much. And Hatoyama's relatively conservative pedigree suggests that he's not going to seek any radical departures from what most Japanese feel comfortable with."

Some Japanese analysts view the victory of the DPJ under Hatoyama as more due to the disgust of large sections of the voters with the long period of corruption and cronyism ridden LDP rule than to any fascination for the DPJ and Hatoyama. Hatoyama has promised wide-ranging changes in the political,economic and social spheres. They are doubtful of his ability to deliver.Three of his promised flagship changes are:

* Regional sovereignty. He has promised to reverse the process of the over-centralisation of the Japanese Government under the LDP by transfering more powers and funds to regional authorities.

* Breaking the nexus between the bureaucracy and the political rulers which, according to him, became the hallmark of the LDP rule. He has promised that he will ensure that politicians are responsible for policy formulation and the bureaucrats are responsible for implementation.

* A shift away from the urban-centric policies of the LDP towards greater attention and importance to the problems of the rural areas.

He has also promised many lollipops to various segments of the population such as pensioners, farmers etc. Skeptics are doubtful whether he would be able to implement them and, even if he wants to, whether he will be able to find the required funds if he sticks to his promise not to raise taxes.

In the manifesto issued by the DPJ when Okada was the President before the 2005 elections to the House of Representatives,the references to India were positive.It said:

* "India is expected to be a nucleus of Asian economic development in the 21st century along with Japan, China, South Korea, and ASEAN. It projects a unique charisma not only as an economic, demographic, and cultural/ philosophical giant but also as a huge democracy. Establishing and maintaining a close relationship, including strategic, with this India will be in the national interests of Japan and will expand Japan's diplomatic options."

* "The East Asian Community should never become an exclusive institution. India, Australia, and New Zealand will be important partners when building a full-scale East Asian Community."

* "Japan can also promote a joint sea lane patrol program against terrorists and pirates in collaboration with ASEAN, China, India, and the United States, naturally paying due respect to the sovereignty of coastal states."

At the same time, it contained a worrisome reference linking Pakistan's nuclear proliferation to the Kashmir issue. It said: "In the overall context of Asian security, WMD proliferation and terrorism are extremely important challenges. The new Japanese government will further promote the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI) and actively engage itself with the peaceful solution of the Kashmir conflict, which has led to the nuclear armament of India and Pakistan."

All these references to India have disappeared from the election manifesto for the August 30,2009, elections drafted under the Presidentship of Hatoyama. The only reference to India in the manifesto is the following sentence: "Play a leadership role in environmental diplomacy and encourage the participation of major emitter nations, including the United States, China,and India, in the "post-Kyoto" international framework for greenhouse gas emissions reduction."

What are the views of Hatoyama on India? Does he attach importance to the strategic relationship between India and Japan? The answers to these questions are not yet available. If one were to go by the latest manifesto, Hatoyama's world consists essentially of Japan, the US, China, South Korea, North Korea (all mentioned by name) and "other countries". India has been relegated to the position of one of the "other countries".

Is this interpretation correct? One has to wait and see.

The text of the foreign policy chapter in the latest manifesto of the DPJ is annexed.

(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. He is also associated with the Chennai Centre For China Studies. E-mail: seventyone2@gmail.com )

ANNEXURE

( From the DPJ's manifesto for the August 30,2009, elections)

VII. Foreign Relations. Build a close and equal Japan-U.S. relationship

Build a close and equal Japan-U.S. alliance to serve as the foundation of Japan's foreign policy. For this purpose, having developed an autonomous foreign policy strategy for Japan, determine the assignment of functions and roles between Japan and the United States, and work positively to fulfil Japan's responsibilities in this regard.Promote liberalization of trade and investment through the conclusion of a free trade agreement (FTA) with the United States. The measures will not include any which are detrimental to the safety and stable supply of food,increasing Japan's food self-sufficiency ratio, and the development of Japan's agricultural industry and its farming villages.Propose the revision of the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement. Move in the direction of re-examining the realignment of the U.S. military forces in Japan and the role of U.S. military bases in Japan.

Strengthen Japan's foreign relations in Asia with the aim of building an East Asian Community.

Make the greatest possible effort to develop relations of mutual trust with China, South Korea, and other Asian countries.Establish intra-regional cooperative mechanisms in the Asia-Pacific region,particularly in such areas as trade, finance, energy, the environment,disaster relief, and measures to control infectious diseases.Take positive measures to promote the conclusion of economic partnership agreements (EPAs) and free trade agreements (FTAs) with countries of the Asia-Pacific region, as well as countries throughout the world, covering a broad range of fields including investment, labour and intellectual property.The measures will not include any which are detrimental to the safety and stable supply of food, increasing Japan's food self-sufficiency ratio, and the development of Japan's agricultural industry and its farming villages.

North Korea must not be permitted to possess nuclear weapons. North Korea's repeated nuclear tests and ballistic missile launches constitute a clear threat to the peace and stability of Japan and the international community, and they certainly cannot be permitted.In cooperation with the international community, especially the United States, South Korea, China, and Russia, we will take firm measures,including cargo inspections, to induce North Korea to abandon the development, possession, and deployment of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and missiles.The abduction of Japanese citizens by North Korea is a violation of Japan's sovereignty and a serious violation of human rights, and we will make every effort to resolve this issue as a responsibility of the Japanese government.

Realise world peace and prosperity. Aim to build world peace that emphasise the importance of the United Nations, and play a significant role by taking the lead on UN reforms and other areas.Play a role in building peace by participating in UN peacekeeping operations and related efforts. However, such participation must be based on Japan's own judgment and must be placed under democratic control and governance.Carry out anti-piracy operations according to proper procedures in order to provide security for maritime transport and make an international contribution.Promote liberalisation of trade and investment, in particular by exercising leadership toward the successful conclusion of World Trade Organisation(WTO) negotiations through such means as improvement of the dispute settlement system and a fundamental review of agricultural and other policies.

Take the lead in working for the elimination of nuclear weapons, and remove the threat of terrorism. Work toward a nuclear-free Northeast Asia.Make efforts to facilitate the early entry into force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) and the early realisation of a Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty.Play a leadership role in the 2010 review conference on the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).To eradicate terrorism and its breeding grounds, study the implementation of economic assistance, strengthening of government institutions, and humanitarian and reconstruction activities, in conjunction with NGOs, and contribute to the eradication of poverty and to national reconstruction.

-Sri Lanka Guardian

The double-talk of Sri Lanka’s U.N. ambassador

By UN Watch

(August 31, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) After he successfully blocked a war-crimes probe into the conflict in Sri Lanka, why is the country’s ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva, being recalled?

Ambassador Dayan Jayatilleka himself offers two different explanations.

Last month, at the U.N. Conference on the Question of Palestine in Geneva, he blamed Israel. “I’m leaving because of protests Israel made about my speeches [condemning Israel’s military operations in Gaza],” he told the gathering on July 23.

In the same statement, Jayatilleka also urged Palestinians to reconsider focusing their “resistance” operations at “soft targets” — not for reasons of morality or international law, but because to do otherwise “plays into the hands of the international media,” he said. “One photo of a rocket and a Jewish kid hiding in a cellar and you get the whole Holocaust narrative all over again,” he complained.

However, a recent article in The Economist quotes Jayatilleka giving a completely different reason (“Behind the Rajapaksa brothers’ smiles,” Aug. 6). “Mr Jayatilleka’s offence, he believes, was to have advocated regional devolution in a newspaper. ‘I thought I was operating within the bounds of government policy,’ he laments.”

So who’s responsible for Ambassador Jayatilleka’s departure, the Sri Lankans or the Israelis? Did the diplomat known for provocative speeches sacrifice his posting on the scenic shores of Lake Geneva for the noble cause of Palestine, or power-sharing with the Tamil minority?

Depends, it seems, on whom one is talking to.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

The challenge of ‘winning the peace’

By Lynn Ockersz

(August 31, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) The relative silence in some Lankan circles, which not so long ago championed the cause of ethnic peace, gives rise to the impression that all discourse on the National Question is considered inappropriate, superfluous and unnecessary, in these post-LTTE times. The implicit assumption in this silence, among particularly one-time local peace activist quarters, seems to be that the ‘Lankan conflict’ has ceased to exist with the elimination of the LTTE.

The pronouncement which has today become a truism in conflict resolution thinking is that a violent, intra-state, identity-based conflict cannot be resolved in its entirety through the adoption by the state party concerned, of only military means. An effort by states to resolve conflicts of this kind, needs to visualize a political component too to the total solution and it is usually the implementation of a political project by the relevant state that meets the legitimate aspirations of the rebelling sections, which helps in solidifying peace and stability within a country. Indonesia’s successful efforts at bringing peace to its once rebellious Aceh province, is one of Asia’s most recent examples of a peace which was won by political means. It is encouraging news that some local state personnel are now looking to Aceh for inspiration to solidify peace in Sri Lanka. May they learn quickly and insightfully, is this writer’s hope.

Unlike in times past, we do not find present day government leaders speaking at length on political solutions to our conflict. Right now, they seem to be engrossed more with the task of winning elections and since the majority community constitutes their main vote base, they apparently consider it inappropriate to speak forthrightly about political solutions, which would need to envisage power-sharing among communities, to prove effective. This is on account of the fact that among those espousing hegemonic control of the Lankan state by the majority community, power sharing is anathema.

Hopefully, once the elections are done with, there would be a frank espousal of the need for a political solution by the current political leadership of Sri Lanka. For, as long as the causes of our conflict, such as the lack of equality in all its dimensions among our communities, go unaddressed, there is unlikely to be a stable peace in this country.

By saying this, the implication is not made that there were wholly sincere efforts at building a peace culture in this country, for instance, during the Chandrika years. Those years saw the gradual entrenchment in Sri Lanka of what came to be derisively referred to as a ‘peace industry’ and numerous were the parties who made a princely living off the ballooning, money-gobbling enterprise of bringing peace to Sri Lanka.

The fact that peace efforts in the past thus suffered disfigurement in the hands of some parasitic elements, does not in any way argue against the need for a sustainable and dynamic peace movement in this country. The prime issues in the conflict are remaining unresolved to date and as long as this is so, the need for a vibrant peace movement would remain. The question is, who among Sri Lanka’s civil society in particular, would provide the leadership and directional power for a movement of this kind.

Fortunately, not all sections of the state are oblivious to the need to build a durable peace which would be sensitive to the legitimate needs of our communities. There is Disaster Management and Human Rights Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe, for instance, who, while addressing a forum recently in Colombo, on the subject of peace-building said, among other things: ’Thus it appears that what is necessary is to internalize the core values of peace if we are to achieve the societal goal of "winning the peace". To do this, we must be committed to demonstrating benevolence through tolerance and accommodation of our fellows, confidence and trust in one another and justice predicated on the principles of equity and equality.’ Earlier, quoting India’s late Premier Jawaharlal Nehru, the minister said: ‘Peace is not merely the absence of war. It is also a state of mind. Lasting peace can come only to peaceful people.’

With sentiments of this kind we are back with a discourse which unambiguously spells out the essential building blocks of a peace culture to which all cultures and communities of this country could relate. The challenge before government leaders is to popularize concepts of this nature and to build a national consensus around them.

But would the political leaders of this land measure- up to this challenge? This is the troubling issue and past experience with our politicians teaches us that they are long on talk but very short on action. It is also not inappropriate to ask: What has become of the APRC’s final proposals? Are we to believe that nothing substantive has come out of the APRC’s prolonged deliberations after all?

Although women and men of goodwill would incline to the view that the above fears are unfounded, the track record of governments to date points to a fundamental insincerity in them to take the message of peace, in the terms broached in this article, to the people. Which major political figure from Southern Sri Lanka, has, for instance, taken the case for ethnic equality in all its dimensions, to the ‘court of public opinion’?

Not even when a peace process was believed to have been fully and vibrantly operative from 2002 to 2004, was the message of peace, in the sense of equality and fraternity among communities, taken to the totality of the Lankan public by the rulers of the land. There seemed to have been a marked reluctance by the government of those times to openly and unambiguously broach the factors that contribute to a wholesome peace. Apparently, the government was stifled by a species of inner paralysis. It, evidently, feared that an open discussion of peace issues would have earned for it the wrath of chauvinists in both South and North.

However, the government of the day sat down to ‘peace talks’ with the LTTE in luxury resorts abroad, in an effort to manage and contain the armed conflict. The government made the cardinal error of equating the totality of the Tamil people with the LTTE. If on the other hand, it raised the awareness of the people everywhere in the land on a just peace, it could have made some progress in alienating the North-East public from the LTTE. Containing the LTTE’s influence over the Tamil people would have, then, proved easier.

The consistent reluctance of governments down the decades to openly and plainly broach the cardinal questions relating to peace, with the Lankan public, only confirms the cynical view in some quarters that governments intentionally keep ethnic tensions alive with the aim of converting them to short term political gain.

Could Sri Lanka look forward to the emergence of leaders of the stature of South Africa’s Nelson Mandela and Fred de Klerk, who could shake hands warmly over ethnic and cultural divides, and work towards democratic accommodation and national unity? A ready ‘yes’ to this poser is not possible right now, but suffice it to know that these remarkable men constitute our standard of political greatness.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

"Continued confinement of innocent civilians may lead to renewed conflict"

(August 31, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) 100 days on from the conflict which blighted Sri Lanka for decades, William Hague has expressed serious concerns about the fate of the innocent civilians who are now residing in internment camps.

William Hague, the British Conservative Party MP and the Shadow Foreign Secretary on Thursday urged the Sri Lankan government to take all possible measures to prevent further suffering".

He called for UN and relief organisations to be given "full and unrestricted access to provide shelter, food, water, and medicine, and to oversee the screening process" – a call made all the more urgent by the onset of the monsoon season.

Hague also stressed the importance of the Sri Lankan government living up to its commitment to allow the people to return to their homes by the end of the year. "Their continued confinement in camps will simply sow the seeds of discontent and may lead to renewed conflict in years to come. This would be a disastrous setback for the country when peace has been so hard won."
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Maldives and geo-politics of India and Sri Lanka

By Satheesan Kumaaran

(August 31, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Maldives is encircled by the geo-political ambitions of various states that strive to bring the entire Indian Ocean rim under their control for their own economic, political and security gains. It’s time for Maldivians to realize the effect of these countries’ ambitions will have on their very survival.

Maldives is a prime military and politically strategic location and, as such, this tiny island-nation in the Indian Ocean always seeks to maintain good relations with other countries in the region. Because Maldives is so tiny, most of the foreign diplomats in charge of the affairs of the island-nation work out of the embassies in Sri Lanka or India. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have resident embassies in Male, the capital city of Maldives.

Maldives, comprised of 1192 small coral islands grouped into 26 atolls, is an attractive tourist destination and, indeed, it is the tourism industry that generates the most revenue, besides fishing. Maldives is home to 369,031 (July 2007 census), Sunni Muslims, inhabiting 200 islands, plus 80 islands with tourist resorts, and so it is preoccupied with the effort to maintain the security of the region and embroiled in the era of fighting terrorism.

Maldivian oral tradition suggests that the first settlers were Dravidians who founded the Indus Valley Civilization, an ancient civilization that flourished in the Indus and Ghaggar-Hakra river valleys primarily in Sindh province of Pakistan and north western and western India, extending westward into Balochistan. The immigrants from Central Asia pushed these people into southern parts of India and its neighboring islands. Giravaaru islanders are classic examples of the people who migrated from western shores of Sri Lanka and claim ancestry from ancient Tamils. The Giraavaru people were just one of the island communities predating Buddhism, the arrival of a Northern Kingly dynasty and the establishment of centralized political and administrative institutions. Islam was introduced in 1153 AD. The Maldives came then under the influence of the Portuguese in 1558 and the Dutch in 1654. In 1887, it became a British protectorate. In 1965, the Maldives obtained independence from Britain, and, in 1968, the Sultanate was replaced by a Republic.

Maldives enjoys considerable political stability and excels in several spheres, including education and human development. His opponents claim that he is a dictator. The opposition parties have staged demonstrations on several occasions, including several in 2004 and 2006 that saw, hundreds of demonstrators killed. Gayoom promised he would bring democratic reform, but has yet to fulfill that promise. In the campaign to bring democratic reform to Maldives, India is a leading player. The officials of the Opposition parties pay frequent visits to India, in order to urge India to continue to play a leading role in democratic reform. Sri Lanka and India have opened their post-secondary institutions to accommodating Maldivian students. The Indian government provided the Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital (IGMH) in Male that has 200-beds, which was inaugurated in 1994, a well equipped medical service facility providing a wide range of secondary and tertiary need of the total population of the Maldives. However, India is also influenced by the fact that Gayoom is pro-Indian and does not want to alienate him.

Environmentally, Maldives is in great danger because its islands are nearly at sea level, making them very susceptible to rising sea levels. Maldives holds the record for being the flattest country in the world, with a maximum natural ground level of only 2.3 m, though in areas where construction exists this has been increased by several metres. Over the last century, sea levels have risen about 20 cm and the ocean is likely to continue rising, threatening Maldives’ existence. Depletion of freshwater aquifers also threatens water supplies, and increased global warming, increased sea levels and coral reef bleaching. However, the government has not taken steps to protect the Islanders from such dangers. Instead, Gayoom is busy working to please other powers to ensure his and his government’s survival.

As Maldivians face environmental consequences, India, Sri Lanka and others continue to invest in the Maldivian state purely for their own economic, political and security gains. The Maldivian government maintains political neutrality and, therefore, cooperates with all countries. It has a pro-India policy, but does not want to alienate China. In 2001, Maldives and China signed a deal allowing China to establish a naval base in Marao for the purpose of countering the rise of Indian and American naval forces in the region. This will definitely give the Maldivian government headaches in years to come, as India and the United States do not want a Chinese naval base on Maldivian soil; however, Maldives agreed to the deal because the nation needed the economic support of booming China. India is also uneasy about China’s recent declaration on March 4, 2008, to increase its defense budget for 2008 to $ 59 billion US, a rise of 17.8 per cent over 2007. A recent Pentagon report prepared for and presented to the US Congress on China’s military development has prompted India to formulate a counter-China policy, purely to counter China’s influence in the region. The Pentagon report put other Chinese neighbours on alert, as well. With this policy in place, India will play crucial role in the security of Indian Ocean rim, and Maldives and Sri Lanka will become hot spots.

Sri Lanka dominated trade with the atoll Maldivian state until the early 1970s, providing 65 percent of Male's imports from the South Asian region. By contrast, India's share was only 32 percent. Further, 10 percent of the country's exports were to Sri Lanka, whereas India’s share was a negligible 0.03 percent. As of 1988, it was Sri Lanka and not India that had a greater involvement with Maldives—economically, diplomatically, politically and culturally. Analysts argue that if one particular country wanted to maintain a good presence in the Indian Ocean that country would need to have great influence in Sri Lanka, which would in turn give it greater influence in Maldives because of the relationship between Maldives and Sri Lanka. China seems to have clued into this line of thinking because it has invested $ 1 billion US over the year in energy, infrastructure and other economic sectors in Sri Lanka, countering India’s investments there.

Sri Lankans and Maldivians also share close ties in the areas of history, culture and language. Linguistics suggests that the Maldivian language can be traced back to roots in Arabic and Sinhala, but more so with Sinhala than Arabic. India sees Maldives as a potential place for its naval practices in its bid to become an international superpower, and it is working hard to build its naval force into one of the finest navies in the world with sophisticated modern technologies to monitor the entire Indian Ocean and beyond. The first Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru, advocated for his nation to build a strong blue-water navy that could control the entire Indian Ocean. Ensuing governments worked hard to fulfill the Nehru’s vision, and now India has one of the most well-equipped and well-manned navies in the world.

Maldives’ geo-strategic position makes it vulnerable to any military action in the region. This vulnerability was clearly demonstrated in the wake of militarization of the Indian Ocean and the heightening superpower rivalry in the 1970s and 1980s. In 1982, President Gayoom stated: "Let us not forget, the Portuguese invaded us because of strategic position. Many covetous eyes are focused on us right now for the same reason".

Maldives’ geo-strategic position has also been factored into its friendly relations with India. During the Cold War period, one of the cornerstones of India’s regional security policy was to prevent the involvement of extra-regional powers in South Asia. India considered any such involvement as inimical to its regional interests. In the 1980s, Sri Lanka sought to use Maldives’ (buttressed by a natural harbour, Trincomalee) by involving external forces to neutralize the India factor in the island’s security or insure itself against the perceived threat of India. Maldives considers India a friend in need, but does not want India’s intervention in their internal affairs because they assume India, with a population of approximately 1.1 billion people and the aspiration of becoming a superpower, may have sinister motives. In turn, India does not want antagonize Maldives because Maldives is a conservative Muslim state with great influence in the Muslim world, including India’s arch enemy, Pakistan. India wants to maintain good relations with Maldives which would, indeed, help India’s aspiration to become a superpower in the world or the policeman of the region.

Since its independence, Maldives has maintained a policy of not permitting the development of any military base by any world power with the exception of the Wartime British air base on its Gan Island in Addu Atoll continued until it was unilaterally given up in 1976. Following the British withdrawal in 1976, the Soviet Union submitted a proposal, via India, for access this abandoned military base, but Maldives rejected the proposal. The Soviet Union wanted to counter the American and British influence in the region. To date, the Diego Garcia atoll located in the heart of the Indian Ocean, some 1,500 km south off Maldives coast, is military home to both the U.S and the British.

After President Gayoom came to power, he adopted a multicultural and bilateral policy, which played a key role during the coup against him in November 1988. The coup was staged by the People’s Liberation Organization of Tamil Eelam (PLOTE), a group raised by India to fight the Sri Lankan government in the late 1970s and early 1980s. PLOTE was one of more than a dozen of Sri Lanka’s Tamil militant groups, all of whom took up arms to create an independent Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka under their own leadership. Because the PLOTE opposed the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka, the PLOTE decided to create a stable base by capturing Maldives; from there, it could launch military attacks against Sri Lanka, weaken the Tamil Tigers, and win independence for Tamil Eelam in Sri Lanka under the leadership of the PLOTE leader, Uma Maheswaran. Although all government departments and facilities, including Parliament, community towers, and radio and television stations were brought under the control of the PLOTE, President Gayoom managed to send an international appeal for political and moral support but sought military help only from India. In response, India sent its naval ships to Maldives, freed the tiny island-nation from the control of the PLOTE within 24 hrs, and handed the administration back to President Gayoom.

The government of Maldives continues to seek harmonious relations with all sides. Sri Lankan fishermen are allowed to illegally enter Maldives waters. Despite the protests of its own fishermen, the Maldivian government refuses to take action against the Sri Lankan fishermen because the Maldives considers Sri Lanka a genuine friend.

So, Maldives may be a battleground in the future, but not because of direct threat from Sri Lanka. The battle will come because other countries have a vested interest in the region. As a major regional player, India will spread its wings to counter the influence of countries like the Chinese on the neighbouring countries of Nepal, Bhutan, Burma and Pakistan, as well as the sensitive Kashmir region. India is more concerned about the south because it is the only way for India to keep the Indian Ocean under its direct control – brining with it billions of dollars worth of investments to India. This body of water truly connects people around the world.

In conclusion, all countries that thrive to bring Indian Ocean rim under their control whether for economic, security or political gains, need to maintain friendly relations with Maldives. To do that, they need to please Sri Lanka, thereby influencing Maldives to bow to their demands. India is a neighboring country with sinister motives and will use Maldives for its own gains, keeping its opponents, like Pakistan and China, at bay. Maldives is located very strategically in the Indian Ocean from an economic, security and political aspects, as well as for safe transportation of oil and gas resources. There is always the need to make new alliances in the current era of terrorism and counter-terrorism.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

UNP’s sins and Chandrika’s mistakes

By Helasingha Bandara

(August 31, Colombo,Sri Lanka Guardian) Despite a few things having gone radically wrong for the government during the past three months, many intellectuals are still very reluctant to criticise the President and his close colleagues with the hope that he or they would get it right soon. Police brutality and indiscipline, intolerance of dissent, arrogance and the dictatorial attitude of the government ministers and their colleagues, corruption and nepotism are some evils that raised their ugly heads in the recent months. As the head of the government the President is held responsible for these, no matter who has committed them. Yet we believe it is unfair to go at him all at once without giving him sometime and a breathing space to think it over and address these evils. After all, he has allowed all Sri Lankans to walk about the streets of the country without the fear of being blown to pieces. Just three months ago everyone feared to get out of their homes. This has been an incredible achievement on his part considering the fact that the LTTE was the most sophisticated, brutal and well equipped terrorist organisation and was perceived to be invincible. Sri Lankans simply cannot overlook that achievement and forget it so soon. Yet the President should know that it is our nature to forget pretty soon. He also should know that every evil of the Government is not compensated by the defeating of the LTTE.

UNP allegedly killed 30,000 young people during the second JVP insurrection. The majority of them died for verbally opposing the UNP government by cheering JVP actions, not for joining any action of the JVP. Some died because the UNP sinner politicians wanted to erase any future political opposition. Most people who were killed in order to achieve this goal belonged to the SLFP. For example, H.B Wanninayake, a former Minister of the UNP government, managed to kill many young people with the help of his two brothers and the Nikeweratiya police. Some of the murdered were from his own village and some of them were his relatives. They were not JVP activists but the coffee shop cheerleaders (kopi kade kaiwaru karayo) .They had suffered discrimination at the hands of Wanninayaka of the Jayawardana Government for over 10 years for supporting the SLFP. The only way to express their anger and frustration was to cheer whoever went against the government. Although Wanniya died like a dog before even reaching 70 the real killers are still at large. No one was brought to book for the killings although there had been some sort of police investigations some years later.

The world rejoiced hearing the sentence of five years rigorous imprisonment for Douglas Pieris for kidnap and murder during the UNP terror regime. The sentence does not justify the crime he committed. At least justice has been done by the guilty verdict. He may come out within a couple of years. Yet society would brand him a murderer. He and his family will always be outcast by society. That would be a sufficient punishment for the crime that he committed. After twenty long years the killers were brought to book by this government. Does it not deserve credit for doing so?

Chandrika managed to bring back law and order into the country when she became President. She dispelled the fears of the masses about the security forces. Her biggest mistake was that she did not take sufficient action to deliver justice to the parents whose children were killed by the UNP politicians and the security personnel. Perhaps she was unsympathetic towards the JVP with the mistaken belief that the JVP killed her husband. The point she missed was that the majority of the youth who were killed did not belong to the JVP but to the SLFP. It was alleged later that Premadasa, and Ranjan Wijerathna were behind the murder of her husband. Perhaps they were both dead when this came to light. That may have made her indifferent towards devising a proper strategy to investigate other crimes. She should not have relaxed until all killers were brought to book. As mentioned earlier we forget quickly. Thus we forgot that it was she who established law and order after two years of immense terror. Had she continued to pursue the killers she would be remembered until today because the cases could still be going on.
A great opening has emerged for Mahinda Rajapaksha to keep himself in the limelight. We all have seen the manifestation of people power against injustice in the Angulana double murder case. People support the government for delivering justice. In this backdrop the president should open up all buried murder cases of the 89/90 era. There are many killers of that era still avoiding justice. Keep getting them netted. As long as these cases come to light people of this country are reminded of the terror rule of the UNP which cost them the reign. If Rajapakshas do not let the people forget the terror regime of the UNP their dynasty can bury UNP forever.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

The bloody road from Vadukoddai to Nanthi Kadal---Part I

"On what non-violent principles did the Jaffna Gandhians endorse violence which was the driving force of the Vadukoddai Resolution? How wise were the leaders of Jaffna to drag the Tamil people into the Vadukoddai nightmare?"
_________________

By H. L. D. Mahindapala

(August 31, Melbourne, Sri Lanka Guardian) Of all the political documents that came out of Jaffna there is none to surpass the Vadukoddai Resolution passed at the Convention of Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF) held in the electorate of Vadukoddai on May 14, 1976. It is the peak point where the diverse Jaffna-centric communal forces, lurching in all directions without a clear focal point (from 50-50 to “federalism”), came together as a decisive political expression of its ruing Vellahla caste/class. It revealed the hidden political agenda of the Tamil political caste/class aggressively. It shed the earlier sham about being non-violent Gandhians in search of a “federal state” and came out openly for the establishment of a separate Tamil state through violence. S. J.V. Chelvanayakam, the father of Tamil separatism, went through it with a fine comb and “approved the choice of words”. ( p.128 – S. J. V. Chelvanayakam and the Crisis of Sri Lankan Tamil Nationalism,1947 – 1977, a Political Biography, A. J. Wilson).

The Vadukoddai Resolution was the finale of the cryptic “little now and more later” (p.128 – Ibid) mono-ethnic extremism headed by Chelvanayakam. Later in his speech to Parliament on November 19, 1976, shortly after passing the Vadukoddai Resolution in May 1976, he spelt it out categorically saying: “We have abandoned the demand for a federal constitution.:(p.129 – Ibid.) The bogus front of federalism presented earlier was a tactical and deceptive cover to advance, covertly and incrementally, towards a separate state. The “approved choice of words” was toned down craftily to preserve the bogus Gandhian veneer while passing the ammunition. Not surprisingly, the so-called Gandhians distributed wooden pistols at their so-called non-violent demonstrations, a clear sign of coming events casting their shadows. The Vellahla masters were brain-washing the Tamil activists to be ready for what was to come.

It was a Resolution that was designed deliberately to find a military solution. The Vellahla manipulators not only “abandoned the demand for a federal solution” but also abandoned, along with it, the idea of finding a solution through parliamentary process which was the only path available for non-violent politics. The Vadukoddai Resolution contained the collective will of the Vellahlas who defined, without any ambiguity, the mono-ethnic and intransigent determination of Vellahla-dominated politics to carve out a domain that would preserve, protect and promote their traditional feudal and colonial power over the peninsula and beyond.

The flow of events that originated from the Vadukoddai Resolution had a devastating impact on the Sri Lankan polity. When it declared war and called on the Tamil youth to take up arms it legitimized violence that rolled down from the north like a demonic juggernaut crushing everything in its wake. It summarized the basic “grievances”, “aspirations”, the political parameters, the ideological base and the ultimate Eelamist objectives of Vellahla politics. Knowing that separatism and violence are inseparable it urged emphatically the violent strategy needed to achieve the final goals of Jaffna political caste/class. After listing the usual litany of complaints in its preamble it declared war in the two concluding paragraphs, which called upon the youth to take up arms and throw themselves into the struggle without flinching until “the sacred fight for ….the goal of a sovereign socialist State of EELAM is reached.”

The Vadukoddai War which began in 1976 ran its full course, through many violent twists and turns, until it went down ignominiously in Nanthi Kadal. The Vellahla fathers of the Vadukoddai Resolution of May 14, 1976 – a suicidal political act that dragged the helpless Tamils and deposited them in the cold waters of Nanthi Kadal on May 18, 2009 -- never expected to be defeated by the Sinhalese. Prof. A. J. Wilson, in his hagiography, elevated his father-in-law to the grade of a “Moses who would lead the Tamil people to their promised land” (p. 8 – Ibid). In hindsight, it is clear that Chelvanayakam was more like the Pied Piper of Ipoh, Malaysia (where he was born) who lured the Tamil people of Jaffna to follow him into the watery graves of Nanthi Kadal.

Despite the devastating impact on the lives and hopes of the misled Tamils, caused primarily by the Vadukoddai Resolution, the Tamils in the diaspora have declared that they are going back to the Vadukoddai Resolution. This is stated explicitly in the provisional declaration of “the Provisional Transnational Government” which, incidentally, has no fixed abode on this planet. How far can the Tamil diaspora go down this track? What do they hope to achieve by flogging dead horse? Have they considered the deadly consequences to the Tamil people who have had enough of the Vadukoddai Resolution? Haven’t the Tamil people paid enough for the folly of their leaders in the past who led them to Nanthi Kadal?

After the collapse of the $300 million killing machine bank rolled by the Jaffna jingoists in the Tamil diaspora (Janes Weekly), after losing international support – mainly from India – and after the humiliating loss of two leaders within a space of three months, the return of the confused Tamil diaspora to a past that has no future is not only counter-productive but suicidal also. To go back to the Vadukoddai Resolution – the political altar on which the Jaffna leadership sacrificed the Tamils with no gain – can only ruin whatever is left of the Tamils in Sri Lanka. The diasporic Tamils, of course, will drop their tears in their beer and whiskey and lead their comfortable lives in Western suburbs. But shouldn’t they, at least out of compassion for their fellow-Tamils who had suffered enough, give some due consideration to rebuild their lives at the end of the futile Vadukoddai War? Or are they opting deliberately, under the cover of concocted theories, to bankroll another violent route to Nanthi Kadal?

Stunned by the unexpected defeat and without knowing how to face the new ground realities the frustrated and disillusioned Tamils in the diaspora have plucked out of thin air another bogus theory for shifting house from Vanni to a non-existent “Provisional Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam”. Without a fixed address on this planet and with no takers at an international level to give it some credibility it is purely a pie-in-the-sky “government” which exists only in the imagination of the big-noting, expatriate Jaffna jingoists who act in the mistaken belief that they can do to the decaying corpses of Nanthi Kadal what Jesus did to Lazarus. Their grand standing may help them to console each other and send a message that they are doing something to salvage their tattered reputations after their millions went down in Nanthi Kadal. But how is a return to Vadukoddai politics going to salvage the Tamils after what happened in Nanthi Kadal?

Their so-called “Provisional Government” is a “government” which is running around like a chook without a head. It is a “government” that no one has recognized – not even the Tamils who have had a gutful se first-hand experiences of going through the Vadukoddai disasters do not wish to relive the violence of the failed past. The fanciful description of its latest political fiction advertised as the “Provisional Transnational Government of Tamil Eelam” is an unrealizable figment in the fevered imagination of political stunt men who have not learnt the lessons staring in their face. Besides, this PTGTE has not even found its citizens yet. According to its own statement, it is looking for a reputable international company to register its one million Tamil voters to hold elections in a transnational electorate that excludes Sri Lanka. It is the first airy-fairy mobile “government” that exists, if at all, somewhere in the far distant stratosphere and, the worst is, they don’t even have a damp squib to get there! How much more comic can they get? In fact, the diasporic text which announces the return to Vadukoddai Resolution reads like a hilarious sit com written by a B-grade script writer who was in a hurry to get to the toilet.

As usual, they believe that they can concoct their own history and live in it by turning their backs on the known history running against their wishes and “aspirations” They are the born mytho-maniacs who fancy that they can force the rivers of history to flow backwards. Haven’t they heard of George Santayana who said, so very wisely, that those who forget their history are forced to relive it? What on earth do they expect to achieve by going back to a failed past? What is the glory left in the Vadukoddai Resolution after it ended in shooting, at point blank range, its own people who were running away from its horrors as fast as their feet could take them? The Jaffna jingoists have a consistent record of becoming the victims of their own political machinations. They declared war against the Sinhalese of the south in the Vadukoddai Resolution and, ironically, it was the children born out of this Resolution first turned their guns on the fathers who drafted and passed the Vadukoddai Resolution.

Any serious or concerned Tamil must take a hard look at the Vadukoddai Resolution and ask: What has it done to the Tamil people of Jaffna? What are the great achievements that the Tamils of Jaffna can boast of now after the Vadukoddai Resolution ended in Nanthi Kadal? How many lives of Tamil children were cut down in their prime as a result of the violence unleashed in the Vadukoddai Resolution? Was the Vadukoddai route the only path available for the Tamils of Jaffna? If all the other Tamil-speaking minority communities decided to co-exist in a multi-cultural society, without resorting to Vadukoddai violence, why did the Jaffna Tamil leadership, which pretended to be non-violent Gandhians, declare war in the Vadukoddai Resolution, unleashing the most brutal violence on the nation and most of all on its own people? Who suffered most from the violent consequences of the Vadukoddai Resolution?

On what non-violent principles did the Jaffna Gandhians endorse violence which was the driving force of the Vadukoddai Resolution? How wise were the leaders of Jaffna to drag the Tamil people into the Vadukoddai nightmare? Why did the so-called superior intellectuals in the Jaffna peninsular fail to follow the more humane and civilized path of non-violent co-existence like the other minority leaders who first language was also Tamil? If the Vadukoddai Resolution is the highest peak of their political imagination then what is the caliber of their intellect? Did not the Tamil leadership overplay their hand imagining that they had the power to defy the whole world and impose their will on Sri Lanka? Who should take responsibility for leading the Tamils into the hell hole in the Vadukoddai Resolution?

The ending of the Vadukoddai Resolution in Nanthi Kadal is the conclusive and triumphant argument that demolishes the unsustainable accusations of blaming the Sinhala-Buddhist of the south for everything that went wrong in the peninsular politics. It is the mono-ethnic extremism of the north that produced the Vadukoddai Resolution. And finally when it sank unceremoniously in the brackish waters of Nanthi Kadal they were dumb founded, more so because they could not scapegoat the Sinhala-Buddhists this time. They launched, with uminitagted arrogance, the Vadukoddai War to teach the Sinhalese a lesson. They financed it. They directed it.

They recruited the old and the young into it. They even forced the young pregnant girls to eat raw pineapples and jump from tree-tops to abort the children in their wombs so that they could be forced to fight in the futile war declared in the Vadukoddai Resolution. And when they lost the Vadukoddai War, after fighting for 33 years rejecting international and national offers of peace, the violent villains of Vadukoddai had no one to blame except their own monumental folly.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Who is the donkey who wants to kill this dunce?

By Rajpal Abeynayake

(August 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Why anybody would want to mess physically with that utterly discredited Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, beats me.

Jehan Perera, Kumar Rupesinghe, Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, these people belong to yesterday. At least two of them, Jehan and Paikiasothy, called for a ceasefire when the Tamil Tigers were well on their way to a military rout.

Basically, Jehan does not have a job anymore because the National Peace Council is irrelevant. Peace has arrived, though not in the temporary Tiger-aggrandizing way that he wanted it. It's now a more permanent arrangement.

It's a story that needs to be investigated and written. With mega bucks, American backing, Rice awards for 'imposing rule of law' etc, the essentially anti-army pro-Tiger lobby lost out. They were in effect a highly overrated quantity, a bunch of snake oil salesmen (…and women) who had intellectual pretensions as well as activist pretensions.

The death threat story gives renewed credence to Paikiasothy, who did his utmost to petition UN agencies during the last phase of the assault against the LTTE, with hopes of getting the UN to intervene in the war and let the LTTE off the hook. He campaigned relentlessly, maintaining that the international community is abdicating its responsibility. Nobody listened, and his hopes of rescuing the LTTE fell in a heap at the banks of the Nandikadaal lagoon.

What good is issuing a death threat on a discredited quantity, a coin decidedly out of circulation?

It's probably why everybody who is out to make a killing out of this purported threat wants to describe Paikiasothy in glowing terms, embellishing him with credentials he cannot by any means lay claim to. One unknown fellow called Quadri Ismail writes -- we are told all the way from the US -- to say that Paikiasothy is one of the "most consistent, courageous, anti-racist voices.''

Anti-racist? This guy is one of the most obnoxious Tamil racists of all time, as was amply indicated by his effort to rescue the LTTE from annihilation, but that's now an old story.

Credibility lost

Anyway, as Margaret Thatcher once said --- being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are powerful, you most probably aren't. If people have to be reminded every hour on the hour that Paikiasothy is what he is supposed to be, ("courageous" "well-regarded') it goes to show indubitably that he is in fact discredited beyond repair.

But with regard to this NGO detritus, it's not just that their credibility is lost - - it's also that their standing in society has taken a hit. When a few writers such as Malinda and myself exposed the Jehans and Paikiasothys of our world relentlessly, literally for years, Colombo society pricked up their ears. Some believed us, but some gave these people the benefit of the doubt.

Today, nobody gives them the benefit of the doubt. Their frenzied and desperate banshee calls during that last phase of LTTE resistance, put paid to any credibility that the may have laid claim to. Today, who can say Jehan is not a liar and an alarmist, for raising the cry of ''mass killings'' which, he said, would blight the Sri Lankan government if the forces went ahead with the assault on the Tamil Tigers?

Despite all efforts of his ilk to artificially whip up the international community into censuring the Sri Lankan government and intervening to stop its final assault on the Tamil Tigers, nothing even remotely earthshaking happened. Apart from a few bumps along the road, the Sri Lankan state is credibly well regarded by the international community of nations. The UN human rights commission could not even get Sri Lanka on its agenda.

That's the extent to which the Jehans, the Paikiasothys and the Kumars of this world have been discredited. That anybody would want to issue a death threat against a washed out has-been such as Paki is beyond belief.

There are many dimensions to their failure, and all make happy reading. Most of these chaps, the Jehans Paikaiasothys and Kumars, often flaunted foreign educational credentials. They dropped "Harvard'' at the drop of hat, as if that was some god-given mandate in itself to begin ruling the country from the shadows. They even flaunted their relatives, such a Nirj Deva, the man with the unpronounceable taken-name, who at various times these days, makes a spectacle of himself in the European parliament.

In the end, a bunch of local educated journalists activists and truth-tellers, poorly funded and often propelled only by their convictions in contrast to NGO dollars that the foreign educated had access to, put paid to the game plan of these foreign agents and shamans.

It's a classic story of down-home Davids crushing dollar pumped Goliaths. These people are now struggling to stay relevant.

Irrelevent

Paikiasosothy has joined the UNP as its shadow foreign minister. They are clinging on to post war issues such as those that are still in existence, but are fast becoming irrelevant, such as freedom of expression issues.

Not that all of these issues will disappear entirely from the national agenda, or from any country's national agenda for that matter. All countries have governance issues, but people in Sri Lanka are falling back on less discredited people than the Paikiasothys and the Jehans to help them iron out these problems.

Today when the business community is falling over each other to invite Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, one of the primary architects of the military success, to launch its business initiatives, we know the extent of the wilderness that the Jehans and the Paikiasothys have been condemned to. In fact, these people simply wouldn't have been written about if some donkey didn't issue a death threat on one of them.

This 'threat' to Paikiasothy is in itself not credible. As the elite did in Venezuela, there is a desperate orchestration of events by the discredited Colombo lobbyists.

If anybody really wanted to 'intimidate'' Paikiasothy, it would have been done during the war, and the last phase. Now when it's all over, and all we have left is optimism and a parade of discredited dunces such as Paikiasothy on display, what is the earthly point in 'intimidating'' this eccentric has-been?

My conclusion therefore is that this is a textbook case of the street curs barking at the moon. You know how these street pups yap around, and urinate on every car tyre? In their world, they are bringing down the sky.

In the end, people know it's a bunch of strays raising a ruckus about nothing. Men will snicker, wives would yawn, and then they would snuggle up to each other in bed saying 'out there it's a dog's life.'

The current civil society initiative to raise governance issues is much the same. It's just a bunch of beat up clapped-out has-been pretenders urinating furiously onto car tyres.

-Courtesy: LakbimaNews
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Jim Rogers was here!

By FS

(August 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) It came as a pleasant surprise and will certainly stimulate Colombo’s stockmarket which is yet to take off after the LTTE was defeated in May, ending over 25 years of fighting. Unknown to many, Jim Rogers, a 67 year-old entrepreneur who first started business as a 5 year-old selling peanuts and then went on to co-found the mega Quantum Fund with billionaire George Soros, visited Sri Lanka last week in a trip that would have raised a lot of interest if those, particularly, in the private sector were aware.

Rogers, an investor with an adventurous streak and frequently quoted by news media on investment options where he has said Sri Lanka is a better bet than India or China, had spent three days here and also visited Kandy. There was no confirmation as to whether he met corporate bosses or private sector executives and whether he came on invitation from the government (he had met mostly government bigwigs) or flew in as a tourist.

Rogers has said that he would recommend to investors the sectors that they need to put their money in, and if this is true, that’s a huge boost to Sri Lanka. Last month, a Central Bank team of officials went on an ‘investment update’ to Singapore, Hong Kong, the US -- Los Angeles, San Francisco, Boston, New York-, London, Bahrain, Dubai and Mumbai meeting some 105 big-time investors and explaining investment prospects.

These are investment bankers who can move millions of dollars at any given time, at the press of a button on a computer. The visit of Rogers and his interest in Sri Lanka would lend more strength to these fund managers to speed up any decision on investing here.

The Central Bank’s foreign reserves are also rising for a multitude of reasons including the IMF tranche, some hedge fund monies coming in and dollar purchases from the inter-bank (money) market to stabilise the dollar. Large flows of dollars into the banking sector, mainly through UN agencies and Non Governmental organisations (NGOs) for humanitarian work, has put pressure on the currency and the Central Bank has been mopping up these excess dollars to ensure the currency doesn’t crash and fall below the current Rs 114-Rs 115 level.

Government agencies are also reportedly considering having an investment forum in Sri Lanka in the next few months with the presence of some of these investment bankers to attract investments into the country.

So far only the tourism sector has taken off with the end of the war. Apart from reviving investments that have been on hold, the industry is also seeing a resurgence in new investments while scenic spots like Trincomalee and Arugam Bay are drawing large crowds – local and foreign. According to some reports, on some weekends, getting a room in Trincomalee has been extremely difficult.

The massive Kalpitiya tourism development project – modelled on the lines of tourism in the Maldives with its 1000 plus one islands – is also on stream. Hotel operators like Jetwing also have other issues on their hands – how to manage properties overseas and here with the new buzz in the industry? Jetwing Sri Lanka Chairman Hiran Cooray says managing time for all these projects which are suddenly coming on stream is the challenge they are facing.

“How do you manage all these,” he said this week after returning from an overseas trip looking at their portfolio in Vietnam and Bangladesh. The same would apply to big-time hoteliers like Aitken Spence and John Keells Holdings which have properties in the Maldives, India and the Middle East and new ones coming up in Sri Lanka.

This is certainly goods news for an industry that has suffered badly during the war. On the other hand stockmarket investors also need to take a cue from tourism and rise a few pegs – hotel stocks in fact are gaining at the Colombo bourse -- in a show of support that Sri Lanka is ready for business once again!
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Let’s get serious about the death penalty

By Malinda Seneviratne

(August 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) One of these days, the state will execute a person currently on death row, as per the current thinking regarding capital punishment in powerful circles. It will be the first legal execution in over 30 years. I am not sure if the instrument of death will be an electric chair, a rope or a lethal injection. I am not sure if it will happen in Bogambara or Welikada. But if the state decides to go ahead and execute, then I have my preferences.

This is how I want it to happen. Location: Galle Face Green. Reason: This place would accommodate the most number of spectators. The Parliament grounds would be an alternative venue since it can hold a lot of people and also because it makes more political and ethical sense given its proximity to the building that houses the most number of people’s representatives. I prefer old style executions, i.e. with the victim tied and his/her head on the chopping block and an executioner bringing down a heavy axe with a well-sharpened blade onto his/her neck. I also want the entire spectacle telecast live in all channels with the radio networks chipping in with moment-to-moment commentaries. I want the pictures of the moment before, the moment and the moment-after splashed across the Sunday papers (Sinhala, Tamil and English). I want lengthy feature articles describing the crime that warranted execution, the victims of the crime and also the murderer’s story, his/her last words, whether or not he/she regretted the crime, why he/she committed it in the first place, with comments of the prosecuting and defending attorneys, the judge, the jurors (if this is legal).

Do I have a fascination for the gruesome? Not at all. I want it this way because people are justifying the death penalty as an effective deterrent. The deterrent argument assumes that every person is a potential murderer and therefore executions should be of the in-your-face kind. We can’t be squeamish about it. I am willing to predict that if this is done there will be such a public outcry against the horrendous act of legal murder that the death penalty would be abolished forthwith.

Deterrence is not the only argument for instituting the death penalty. Some use the eye-for-an-eye argument. As Albert Camus argues eloquently in his influential essay on the subject, ‘Reflections on the Guillotine’, an execution never corresponds to the murder to which it is purported to be punishment. Camus argues that there is no crime, however gruesome, that matches legal execution for the horrors of premeditation. No victim suffers what the murderer is made to suffer consequent to the sentence being issued. No murderer informs his/her victim of the date and time of death, the instrument of death and holds the victim in confinement with the proverbial sword of death hanging over his/her head as does a legal system that sanctions the death penalty.

Does this mean that murderers should be allowed to go scot-free? No, this is why there are prisons, there are life-sentences. Those who have been determined to be threats to society must be held in facilities which serve to insulate society from them. Neither the death penalty nor life imprisonment are guarantees of lowering of the crime rate. That would mean that all other social, economical and other factors have been immobile and that instituting the death penalty would supersede all these in determining the behaviour of human beings. Utter nonsense, I believe. Lowering the crime rate requires greater vigilance on the part of the citizenry, a stronger sense of civic duty, better and more effective policing and a more efficient legal system.

While there is premeditation in many murders, an equal number fall under the category, ‘Crimes of passion’. These are perpetrated with hardly any reflection on the possible consequences. Someone who kills a person in a fit of jealousy would hardly be expected to worry about being executed at a later date. In most instances the murderer has absolved him/herself of guilt already. The death penalty will not deter such a person.

The most compelling argument against the death penalty, in my book, is its irreversibility. You cannot compensate an executed man if it is later found that he was not guilty. Let me recall the case of P.D. Jamis. He was released from the Welikada Prison after spending 50 years in remand without conviction. Justice took a while, but it did arrive. Had he been condemned to die, however, and if the injustice of the determination was proved 50 seconds after the fact, no power on earth could have righted the wrong. It has been pointed out by many legal luminaries that it is impossible to eliminate the chance of judicial error. The possibility that one innocent man or woman may be legally executed ought to be enough reason to abolish the barbaric practice. But perhaps, barbarians are who we are, as a society, if we do not raise our voices against the death penalty and if this is the case, then Galle Face is where the action ought to be come that terrible day (if and) when the state decides to execute someone on death row.

Murder cannot be sanctioned. We must empathize with the loved ones of the victim, understand their horror, anger and despair. We must not let emotion rule reason, however, in our response to murder. If that were the case, then again, I only have Galle Face, a (chopping block) and a gahalaya (executioner) to offer a society intent on elevating revenge to the heights of justice.

Malinda Seneviratne is a freelance writer who can be contacted at malinsene@gmail.com
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Rape of Victoria resoviour areas by the corrupt agents of Environmental Ministry

By Mahinda Weerasinghe

(August 30, Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Greater Teldeniya villages such as Udispatuwa, Ranmulla, Rankanda, Udawela, Pahurugolla, etc., have blood on its plains and mountains. The environment of these villages the last four years has been battered and its landscape systematically turned into a veritable desert. Indeed thousands of acres of its magnificent bio-diverse vegetative canopy, exotic animals and plants, natural aquifers and other sources of water have been systematically violated. Agricultural lands (e.g., cash crops, cocoa, pepper, vanilla, mangos, avocados etc.,) of the Central Highlands are being literally eradicated as we speak.

The reason is palpable; its surface and ground water is draining off as soon as the rains touch the ground as a result of the on going rock quarrying activities. And during the drought intervals the existing trees are dying in large numbers as no water is retained by its roots due to such unrelenting quarrying. These areas which once fed the Victoria reservoir with a substantial amount of water are now incapable of doing so. This in turn would effect the power generation the country needs badly.

How has this appalling situation com to be?

The Kandyan peasants who are residing in these areas are innocent and pretty backward. They are mostly unlettered and ignorant of taking up issues and defending their rights. Also they are utterly helpless and frightened of the rich and powerful outsiders who intrude into their life and float commercial ventures detrimental to their well been. So when a cancerous project is set in motion injurious to their environment, they are helpless to resists or protect their rights or their heritage.

Indeed the situation is very similar to a cancer. A cancer starts with a single renegade cell, and then commences to multiply, and finally take control of the entire body before delivering it the coup de grace. This environmental degradation is similarly gathering momentum to encompass the whole of Victoria reservoir belt.

How was the rape of this bountiful land initiated?

It was covertly initiated by the corrupt agents of the environmental authority of Minister Campika Ranavaka. These watch dogs of the environment have been slyly issuing licenses for rock quarrying without first consulting the local populace as the law of the land dictates. Now greed of the rock quarry interest and the avarice of the environmental agents have merged, and their greed knows know limits.

Bottom line is, these peasants now find they not only have to walk miles for their water needs, but they also will soon loose their livelihood; for they are unable to plant any crops or grow them as they find the land deficient of water, for as soon as the rains hits the ground the water drains off and dissipates.

Mining affects the environment and the society. Its related disruptions can significantly affect the physical environment in the form of contaminated surface and ground waters, changes in river regimes and water tables and the destruction or loss of habitat for certain species. Mining also affects the local communities through the disruption of their livelihood activities. In order to mitigate these impacts, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) spearheaded several initiatives to cushion the effects of mining to the environment. The immediate impact of rock quarrying is:

The vegetation and the roots of trees which conserve the water after a rain fall is shaken by the blasting and incessant vibration, hence the slow process of release of water by the root systems is disrupted. In such a manner its water retention powers shattered and the vegetative regeneration aborted.

Also fissures caused by the dynamiting and the subsequent vibration activity breaks down the water retaining systems of the top soil. Hence the water just dissipates and seeps out as soon as it touches the ground.

Indeed the incessant vibration due to the quarrying process of the material also helps filter the water out and hinders the roots from being able to store the water. The immediate results are:

1. Due to dynamiting and systematic vibration of the hills the acqufirs are destroyed and water retaining roots and top soil is shaken, that the roots water retention abilities or conservation of the water it needs is disrupted. So no rain fall means, the trees and plants simply wither away and die.
2. Erosion of soil after heavy rainfall is also a resultant of such activity.
3. Lack of air pollution measures as no provisions are made for dust control or restoration of sites, affect the air and bring terrible diseases to man and beast that inhabit these areas.
4. Vibrations/noise pollution resulting from use of explosives in blasting disrupts the pollination related activity. And the pollination processes are disrupted that fresh vegetation is suspended.
5. No provisions are made for dust control, noise or restoration of sites.
6. No environmental or ecological studies have been developed before initiating these quarries.
7. No solution has been taken in connection with land degradation as a consequence of washings and sludge disposal, as well as abandoned quarries.
8. Lack of modern tools and equipment makes matters worse.

This quarrying activity not only destroys the natural surface/underground water sources, it also contaminates the downstream rivers and ultimately the Victoria catchments itself, as it feeds from the quarrying environs hence will have far reaching consequences. Sri Lankans will soon find that through rock mining, which hardly pay any taxes, the land becomes caustic and completely devoid of water to a point that no living thing can survive on it, leave alone its vegetative canopy which is being blasted to smithereens.

At the moment an estimate of over 10000 families are adversely affected. But that is just the beginning. Under this ruthless mining activity the cancer will keeps multiplying and the place will soon be like a war torn area. Unless it’s brought to an immediate halt, the forests plains and hills of the Central Highlands which has existed thousands of years will be lost and in time would come to disrupt the Victoria energy production itself.

While Hon. Minister Champika Ranavaka is preaching to the world how to protect the environmental and what remedies should be initiated. His corrupt agents are raping the environment and minting money through the rape of the nation’s wealth. The very people who were paid salaries to look after the environment are in fact helping destroy it by joining the ruthless and unethical miners. Indeed asking environmental agents to look after the environment is like asking the fox to look after the chicken coop.

The over ridding fact seems to escapes the Hon. Minister. The Buddha’s first act upon gaining enlightenment was; he did not go out to pronounce to the world, his findings. What he did instead was he approached the Bo tree to give thanks for the shade it provided in his long quest for knowledge. That’s the reason every Buddhist temple has a Bo tree, and the devotees pour water to its roots. But no Buddhist temple that I know of has rock quarrying in the temple. Naturally; for indeed it is extremely harmful to the environment, and an adverse effect on the creatures subsisting in it.

The writer begs the concerned people such as geologists, environmentalists and hydrologists to come forward and aid us to bring these corrupt environmental ministry agents to book and defend the country from rape and violation of our beautiful heritage. If not in time this cancer will engulf the whole nation. We call upon both national and international environmental watchdog agencies to aid us fight these corrupt environmental mafia agents and save this wondrous Victoria heritage from rape. E mail to mybecoming@gmail.com your suggestions. All support and advice will be greatly appreciated.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Did Sri Lanka bankroll funds to the Tory Lord?

EXCLUSIVE

By Our Correspondent in London

(August 30, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) A very reliable source in the Sri Lanka High Commission in London confirmed that funds have been clandestinely transmitted to a Sri Lankan government supporting opposition Conservative party Lord in the House of Parliament to help the Lord to campaign for the government of Sri Lanka.

The source requesting to maintain his anonymity said the former Maldivian Prime Minister Maumoon Abdul Gayoom was the middleman used to transmit funds to the said Lord.

Further inquiries confirmed that the President of Sri Lanka is totally disappointed with the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and is hoping that situation will change for him with the election of the Conservative Party in the general elections to be held in the UK within the next eighteen months.

The High Commission source would not confirm any details about the sum given to the Tory Lord or when it was transferred or even the further intricacies involved in the deal.

The Lords name is withheld in the news until further specific information is gathered about the clandestine funding.
-Sri Lanka Guardian

Danger: Rajapakse government running out of enemies!

"The Rajapakse boys still have their favourite whipping boy — the Western powers. How much these Western powers helped President Rajapakse to win the provincial council elections will never be acknowledged. The more these Western nations objected to his military offensives and asked him to call them off, his popularity rocketed sky high among the Sinhalese."
___________________

By Gamini Weerakoon

(August 30. Colombo, Sri Lanka Guardian) Venetian writer, Michael Dibdin in his novel, Dead Lagoon says: ‘There can be no true friends without true enemies. Unless we hate what we are not, we cannot be what we are. These are the old truths we are painfully rediscovering after a century of and more of sentimental cant. Those who deny them, deny their family, heritage, their culture, their birthright, their very selves. They will not easily be forgiven.’

This quotation is extracted from one of the most controversial political theories in recent times: The Clash Of Civilisations by Harvard Professor Samuel P. Huntington who describes the writer Dibdin as a nationalist demagogue and notes that ‘the unfortunate truth in these old truths cannot be ignored by statesmen and scholars.’

Huntington comments further: ‘For people seeking identity and reinventing ethnicity enemies are essential and potentially the most dangerous occur across the fault lines between the world’s major civilisations.’

Friends and enemies in Lanka

All this of course goes against well known accepted beliefs and norms of Sri Lankans down the ages such as: ‘Hatred does not cease with hatred but by love alone’ and ‘Whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other’, while we also sincerely believe what Hollywood keeps blurting out: ‘love makes the world go round and around.’

Our interest in recalling this quotation of the Venetian writer is not for in depth scholarly analysis but with regard to a rather mundane development in the Sri Lankan political horizon: The Rajapakse administration and its cheering squads appear to be running short of enemies!

Absence of enemies in politics is usually considered to be a tremendous advantage but is it really so? In the Sri Lankan context, can a contestant say of his opponent: ‘He’s a jolly good fellow but I am better, so vote for me?’ To us it appears that without a strong political enemy whom you can smear with mud, you will be only shadow boxing.

Velu and others

Just five months ago there was the devil incarnate, Velupillai Pirapaharan who is no more with his chief disciples, now presumed dead. After Pirapaharan and his cronies were gone, the enemy of the government was presumed to be the expatriate Tamil community who appointed K.P. Kumaran Pathmanadan (or did he appoint himself) leader of the LTTE. Sri Lanka’s James Bonds apparently had bundled up KP out of a Malaysian hotel and now he is with interrogators in Colombo, and is singing like a canary, state and pro state publications say.

So, President Mahinda Rajapakse is left — or robbed — of his most powerful enemy; the greatest threat to the nation eliminated. Despite their murders and mayhem it was the burden on the President of the country to bring the terrorist’s head home. But with the terrorists eliminated has Rajapakse’s importance been vastly diminished?

Danduwam Mudalali

LTTE terrorists may still remain under the grass or hidden in bushes but not so the all powerful International Danduwam Mudalali — the IMF. What a punching bag it was for Rajapakse propagandists in recent months till the billion dollar loan was granted! The IMF we were told was in cahoots with terrorists. Western powers particularly America was behind moves to prevent the loan coming through with the objective of bringing the Rajapakse administration to its knees. How dare they block the loan? they asked. Mahinda Rajapakse with his financial giants like Nivard Cabraal stood firm and the IMF caved in, we are told! That’s the stuff Mahinda and his men are made of — real war heroes. Could Ranil have ever done that?

But now the International Danduwam Mudalali is no threat. So why whip a dead horse even after the loan was given at a concessionary rate of 0.2 per cent? But then the government has also lost one of its enemies by him becoming a friend. It’s one less whipping boy. Instead Cabraal et al are thumping one another’s back saying that the grant of the billion dollar loan is a measure of appreciation of the stability of the Sri Lankan economy! The Chinese prediction about the Year of the Ox appears to be true.

In the bad old UNP days when the IMF or World Bank gave assistance to Sri Lanka, dyed-in-the-red Marxists and fellow travellers in the SLFP calculated the number of years future generations would take to pay back such loans. Now we measure it in terms of our economy’s robustness.

Western assistance

The Rajapakse boys still have their favourite whipping boy — the Western powers. How much these Western powers helped President Rajapakse to win the provincial council elections will never be acknowledged. The more these Western nations objected to his military offensives and asked him to call them off, his popularity rocketed sky high among the Sinhalese.

Our President is standing up to the mighty powers and asking them to go to hell, they said, buoyed up by a surge of patriotism. Someone should carry out a survey to gauge the extent to which Western powers boosted Rajapakse in his recent provincial council victories.

But now these Western nations are looking benignly at our intransigent President. Only last week an American court rejected an appeal to lift the ban on the LTTE. Is President Rajapakse losing this enemy too?

Only in Britain where an election is round the corner, where Tamil expatriates may be able to tilt the election results in some electorates, noise is being made against armament supplies that were given to Sri Lanka. Will Rajapakse lose this enemy and whipping boy too after elections and a change of government in our former mother country?

UNP friends and enemies

What of enemies within the country? The one time hot-shots of the UNP are now calling the shots for Mahinda’s government — GL, Sarath Amunugama, Milinda Moragoda etc. In fact they are still de jure UNP. But more important is that a leading contender for UNP leadership in the UNP, S.B. Dissanayake, last week publicly declared that the UNP can’t win the Southern Province elections. With leading ‘enemies’ like that does Rajapakse need friends or enemies, some ask.

But imagine Mahinda Rajapakse’s plight? He can no longer get on a platform before southern yokels and take on the IMF, World Bank, Western powers or even UNP leaders like SB. What is he to tell them now? They are all jolly good fellows if they do not keep company with Mangala Samaraweera and Ranil Wickremesinghe?

Mahinda Rajapakse should realise that making friends is easy but vicious and hard enemies are also very essential.
-Sri Lanka Guardian